Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 20947

Received: 14/03/2020

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Chandler

Representation Summary:

I support the findings of GNLP that this site is unsuitable for industrial development on the basis that there is a wealth of alternative designated industrial sites better suited for re location of the Ben Burgess company. I do not agree that the GNLP is unable to prevent the application be on the basis that it is an existing application particularly as the final detailed application has not been made.
It is our hope that the South Norfolk Planning Officers will be sufficiently supported by the findings of the officers of the GNLP against further unplanned and unnecessary industrial development.

Full text:

I support the findings of GNLP that this site is unsuitable for industrial development on the basis that there is a wealth of alternative designated industrial sites better suited for re location of the Ben Burgess company. I do not agree that the GNLP is unable to prevent the application be on the basis that it is an existing application particularly as the final detailed application has not been made.
It is our hope that the South Norfolk Planning Officers will be sufficiently supported by the findings of the officers of the GNLP against further unplanned and unnecessary industrial development.