Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21028
Received: 15/03/2020
Respondent: Dr Michael Green
GNLP2017
Land immediately north of this plot is only recently developed: plans to EXTEND this development effectively undermine the trust and process of limiting this original development to 10 houses and new community hall, ensuring village character is sustained to some extent. Thus I support Broadland DC and object to any further development in this area.
Furthermore, Strumpshaw is within the immediate buffer (1 mile) of Broads National Park and is inappropriate for urban development - the environmental footprint will be inappropriate in terms of noise and light pollution, as well as the peaceful vicinities of the buffering lands.
GNLP2017
Land immediately north of this plot is only recently developed: plans to EXTEND this development effectively undermine the trust and process of limiting this original development to 10 houses and new community hall, ensuring village character is sustained to some extent. Thus I support Broadland DC and object to any further development in this area.
Furthermore, Strumpshaw is within the immediate buffer (1 mile) of Broads National Park and is inappropriate for urban development - the environmental footprint will be inappropriate in terms of noise and light pollution, as well as the peaceful vicinities of the buffering lands.