Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21623
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Mr James Matthews
I object strongly to the inclusion of the site as ‘preferred’ its inclusion is based on flawed documents and reasoning.
Coltishall does not have good transport links as stated
The site entrance is on a ‘c’ class one way road with a narrow hump back bridge. No ‘informal agreement with Highways has been obtained as stated, only a requirement for a full transport survey which has not been carried out.
No climate impact assessment has been carried out, a development in an isolated conservation villages will have a considerable greater carbon foot print compared to more urban developments
I object strongly to the inclusion of the site as ‘preferred’ its inclusion is based on flawed documents and reasoning.
Coltishall does not have good transport links as stated
The site entrance is on a ‘c’ class one way road with a narrow hump back bridge. No ‘informal agreement with Highways has been obtained as stated, only a requirement for a full transport survey which has not been carried out.
No climate impact assessment has been carried out, a development in an isolated conservation villages will have a considerable greater carbon foot print compared to more urban developments