I submitted detailed objections to the inclusion of the following sites for housing development:

• GNLP0391 A and B – Land at Framingham Earl, Burgate Lane (4.60 hectares)
• GNLP2153 – Land South of Burgate Lane, Poringland (9.30 hectares).
My objections were attached as a document to an email dated 12th December 2018, to which I received an acknowledgement dated 13th December 2018.

I endorse and fully support the Greater Norwich Planning Policy Team’s decisions and reasoning for not including these sites for housing development listed under “Unreasonable Sites – Residential”, namely:

• GNLP0391 A and B – Land at Framingham Earl, Burgate Lane (4.60 hectares)
“Neither of these sites are considered to be suitable for allocation. Roads serving both parts of GNLP0391 are narrow lanes considered unsuitable for serving additional development. Site B in particular would be intrusive into open countryside to the south-east of the settlement and would significantly adversely affect views of the landscape from the south. In addition, high amounts of existing commitments and environmental/ infrastructure constraints limit the potential for additional new housing in Poringland.”

• GNLP2153 – Land South of Burgate Lane, Poringland (9.30 hectares)
“This site is not considered to be suitable for allocation as development would be intrusive into open countryside to the south-east of the settlement and would significantly adversely affect views of the landscape from the south. High amounts of existing commitments and environmental/ infrastructure constraints limit the potential for additional new housing in Poringland.”