Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 22064

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Ms Kerri-Anne Watson

Representation Summary:

Objects to development at Reedham on the grounds of
lack of public transport, potential impact to the character of the village, visual impact arising from poor design, sewage capacity, access constrains.

Full text:

I am writing with objections to any further development on greenfield sites in Reedham, Norfolk.

I have carried out a lot of reading and research into the proposed development for Reedham and cannot fathom why Reedham has been selected for further development.

Firstly, have you ever visited Reedham?? Reedham is surrounded by marsh land and a river. It is serviced by two narrow roads and a chain link ferry. I understand that one of the roads is classified as a ‘B’ road, but it is narrow and not wide enough for two large vehicles at least 5 points. This is evidenced by the many lay-bys along the route.

Secondly, Reedham’s location is not a prime commuter spot and does not have adequate public transport links. There is only one bus a day and trains run every two hours at points during the day.

Thirdly, I have lived in Reedham for 20 years and it’s a beautiful village, full of history and character. Building new homes ruins the things that makes the village so attractive.

It is attractive for tourism and this would be lost if we ‘commercialised’ the area with 100 unsightly new homes.

The most recent development at Owl Barn Close in Reedham is an example of how unsightly new homes would look in Reedham. I travelled over the chain ferry last week towards Reedham and was horrified to see much those new 4/5 bedroom properties at the front of the development stick out as you look over the village. It’s disheartening to see how the traditional village has already been tarred with modern, characterless buildings.

Please please please do not allow for further housing developments to be built in this picturesque village.

I understand that growth is inevitable, and a few houses here and there is expected. However, the allocation given by GNLP is wholly unacceptable and illogical.

Fourthly, there are much more suitable sites along the new NDR or in the suburbs of Norwich with better road links, public transport, sewerage. Reedham is not equipped with any of those things. Reedham CANNOT cope with more houses.

I know a few other villagers have sent more detailed explanations about the poor amenities that Reedham has to offer and I don’t know enough about the sewerage in the village to make a detailed comment, but I have heard from many people that our systems are unable to cope with the current demand, let alone with loads of extra houses.

I trust you will take my concerns into account and give serious consideration about taking Reedham off the GNLP.