Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 23066

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Hingham Town Council

Representation Summary:

Hingham Town Council object to any new sites being allocated for house building in revised local plans to 2038 until all existing allocations in current core strategies have been developed.
Hingham Town Council object to sites GNLP 0501 and GNLP0502 being deemed as unsuitable. Highways have commented that there is not an achievable highway access point, however the Town Council believe that this would be achievable, using land currently owned by the Town Council to create an access point onto Springfield Way.
A development in this location would give better pedestrian access (than GNLP0520) to the town’s sports facilities, village hall, library and small businesses in the Fairland and Market Place. Children would not have to cross the B1108 to access the primary school (as they would from GNLP0520). Although it is considered that this footway link would be more adequate than the footway link from GNLP0520 (Norwich Road), the need for a pedestrian priority crossing point on the B1108 would need to be addressed.
A development on GNLP0501 would be likely to have a less detrimental visual impact on the approach to Hingham than GNLP0520, although the development would need to provide a range of housing (to suit Hingham Town Council object to any new sites being allocated for house building in revised local plans to 2038 until all existing allocations in current core strategies have been developed.
Hingham Town Council object to sites GNLP 0501 and GNLP0502 being deemed as unsuitable. Highways have commented that there is not an achievable highway access point, however the Town Council believe that this would be achievable, using land currently owned by the Town Council to create an access point onto Springfield Way.
A development in this location would give better pedestrian access (than GNLP0520) to the town’s sports facilities, village hall, library and small businesses in the Fairland and Market Place. Children would not have to cross the B1108 to access the primary school (as they would from GNLP0520). Although it is considered that this footway link would be more adequate than the footway link from GNLP0520 (Norwich Road), the need for a pedestrian priority crossing point on the B1108 would need to be addressed.
A development on GNLP0501 would be likely to have a less detrimental visual impact on the approach to Hingham than GNLP0520, although the development would need to provide a range of housing (to suit

Full text:

For full representation response, please refer to the attached document.

Attachments: