Object
Publication
Representation ID: 23686
Received: 13/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Bob Wilson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I understand that under this part of the process you are looking for comments on the soundness and legal compliance of this stage. I believe that the proposal for Aylsham is not legally compliant because Regulation 18 stated that Aylsham would have ONE site that was put forward for consultation but Regulation 19, and the map clearly shows this, states that there will be TWO sites which has not been consulted upon. I understand there has been no consultation with the Town Council or local residents on such a major development which seems like a circumvention of what is legal and morally correct.
In addition, I believe the proposals are not sound as Regulation 19 failed to consider the impact of 2 sites on the infrastructure needs of the town which is clearly one of the key elements of any project such as this one.
I understand that under this part of the process you are looking for comments on the soundness and legal compliance of this stage. I believe that the proposal for Aylsham is not legally compliant because Regulation 18 stated that Aylsham would have ONE site that was put forward for consultation but Regulation 19, and the map clearly shows this, states that there will be TWO sites which has not been consulted upon. I understand there has been no consultation with the Town Council or local residents on such a major development which seems like a circumvention of what is legal and morally correct.
In addition, I believe the proposals are not sound as Regulation 19 failed to consider the impact of 2 sites on the infrastructure needs of the town which is clearly one of the key elements of any project such as this one.