Object
Publication
Representation ID: 24064
Received: 18/03/2021
Respondent: RG Carter & Drayton Farms Limited
Number of people: 2
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Unsound - Not justified
The plan has failed to justify through proportionate and consistent evidence the selection of allocated site GNLP0337, identified contingency site GNLP2043/0581 and the rejection of Reasonable Alternative sites GNLP0332R and GNLP0334R.
See seperate attached representation document (Reg19) and evidence from Reg 18 stage.
We recommend that:
a) proportionate evidence, properly informed by Sustainability Appraisal should be prepared and consulted on either to demonstrate the suitability of the proposed allocation sites and contingency site in comparison with other Reasonable Alternative sites or to demonstrate the suitability of sites GNLP0332R and GNLP0334R as either allocated sites or contingency sites.
b) Subject to evidence and consultation, the GNDP could elect to allocate or identify both sites GNLP0332R and GNLP0334R for development or contingency, as alternatives to presently allocated or identified contingency sites or as additional allocated or contingency sites.
Unsound - Not justified
The plan has failed to justify through proportionate and consistent evidence the selection of allocated site GNLP0337, identified contingency site GNLP2043/0581 and the rejection of Reasonable Alternative sites GNLP0332R and GNLP0334R.
See seperate attached representation document (Reg19) and evidence from Reg 18 stage.