GNLP0568
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 12915
Received: 06/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Julian Halls
Lack of infrastructure and dangerous access BUT this has already been approved by South Norfolk so what is the bloody point of commenting !!
Lack of infrastructure and dangerous access BUT this has already been approved by South Norfolk so what is the bloody point of commenting !!
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13967
Received: 14/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Trevor Cullum
Agent: Durrants Ltd
On behalf of our client we welcome and agree with the Growth Boards initial comments and conclusions, and would reiterate that this site is not only available and a deliverable site but also represents a suitable and sensitive site for allocation in the JLP for residential development.
On behalf of our client we welcome and agree with the Growth Boards initial comments and conclusions, and would reiterate that this site is not only available and a deliverable site but also represents a suitable and sensitive site for allocation in the JLP for residential development.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14054
Received: 15/03/2018
Respondent: Ms Karen Dunn Hughes
Lack of infrastructure. The Environment Agency's website shows this site is subject to high flood risk from surface water.
Lack of infrastructure. The Environment Agency's website shows this site is subject to high flood risk from surface water.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15312
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Janis Raynsford
As for P0567 - an intrusion into a very rural part of the village and the proximity to Station Road.
As for P0567 - an intrusion into a very rural part of the village and the proximity to Station Road.