GNLP0568

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12915

Received: 06/02/2018

Respondent: Mr Julian Halls

Representation:

Lack of infrastructure and dangerous access BUT this has already been approved by South Norfolk so what is the bloody point of commenting !!

Full text:

Lack of infrastructure and dangerous access BUT this has already been approved by South Norfolk so what is the bloody point of commenting !!

Support

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13967

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Trevor Cullum

Agent: Durrants Ltd

Representation:

On behalf of our client we welcome and agree with the Growth Boards initial comments and conclusions, and would reiterate that this site is not only available and a deliverable site but also represents a suitable and sensitive site for allocation in the JLP for residential development.

Full text:

On behalf of our client we welcome and agree with the Growth Boards initial comments and conclusions, and would reiterate that this site is not only available and a deliverable site but also represents a suitable and sensitive site for allocation in the JLP for residential development.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14054

Received: 15/03/2018

Respondent: Ms Karen Dunn Hughes

Representation:

Lack of infrastructure. The Environment Agency's website shows this site is subject to high flood risk from surface water.

Full text:

Lack of infrastructure. The Environment Agency's website shows this site is subject to high flood risk from surface water.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15312

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Janis Raynsford

Representation:

As for P0567 - an intrusion into a very rural part of the village and the proximity to Station Road.

Full text:

As for P0567 - an intrusion into a very rural part of the village and the proximity to Station Road.