GNLP2050

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Comment

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17660

Received: 03/12/2018

Respondent: Taverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It was felt that this plot could accommodate a residential development - Unanimous

Full text:

Please find below comments from Taverham Parish Council's Planning Meeting on the 12th November 2018:

Adjoining Fakenham Road - Site Reference GNLP2129. It was felt that this plot was unsuitable for residential use. J Latchford proposed, seconded by Maria Temple to object to this site - Unanimous
High Breck Farm - Site Reference GNLP2047. It was felt that this plot could accommodate 5 dwellings - Unanimous
East of Fir Covert Road - Site Reference GNLP2050. It was felt that this plot could accommodate a residential development - Unanimous
151 Taverham Road - Site Reference GNLP2051. Representations had been made by TRAG opposing the development of this site. This site is in the Wensum Valley, a Special Area of Conservation and SSSI. It was commented the road network couldn't sustain this number of houses. J Latchford proposed, seconded by J Pennells to object to this site - Unanimous

South of Taverham Road - Site Reference GNLP2106. It was felt that this plot was unsuitable for residential use, similar reasons as for GNLP2051 - J Latchford proposed, seconded by J Pennells to object to this site - Unanimous

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18588

Received: 12/12/2018

Respondent: Dr. & Mrs. Jonathan & Maura Mould

Representation Summary:

No CLEAR and unambiguous statement as to the intended development( and there is a world of difference between housing and business development).The NDR traffic flows on this road have EXPLODED. A planned Lidl supermarket will substantially increase frequency of traffic all day long,all year round.Statistics have borne this out wherever Lidl is. So I would strongly object to unspecified housing or businesses with all their consequent upheavals beside a large veterinary surgery which was "questionably" given approval outside of the settlement boundary!! Keep the perimeter of Thorpe Marriott free and encourage further building there in TMarriott and not casual speculation.

Full text:

No CLEAR and unambiguous statement as to the intended development( and there is a world of difference between housing and business development).The NDR traffic flows on this road have EXPLODED. A planned Lidl supermarket will substantially increase frequency of traffic all day long,all year round.Statistics have borne this out wherever Lidl is. So I would strongly object to unspecified housing or businesses with all their consequent upheavals beside a large veterinary surgery which was "questionably" given approval outside of the settlement boundary!! Keep the perimeter of Thorpe Marriott free and encourage further building there in TMarriott and not casual speculation.