GNLP2031
Support
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 16885
Received: 02/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Andrew Fox
I am writing in support of this site, having made the original application for the land to be included in the Plan. On reflection, the site may only be suitable for around 15 to 20 dwellings, rather than the original number put forward. I believe the perceived risk is based on a theoretical model,with no past problems. Had the original owners chosen to sell the land would already have been developed so was obviously seen as suitable even 50 years ago, when the pressure on housing was much less than is the case today.
I am writing in support of this site, having made the original application for the land to be included in the Plan. On reflection, the site may only be suitable for around 15 to 20 dwellings, rather than the original number put forward. I believe the perceived risk is based on a theoretical model,with no past problems. Had the original owners chosen to sell the land would already have been developed so was obviously seen as suitable even 50 years ago, when the pressure on housing was much less than is the case today.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17251
Received: 21/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Darren Webster
No consideration has been given to how residents living in the proposed new houses would access these without damaging significantly the area. More vehicles using Church Road would put additional pressure on the junction with the A140 which is already very dangerous due to poor visibility in both directions. Church road is already used as a rat run onto the A140 for vehicles coming from Mulbarton and any junction with Church road coming from the new development would exaccerbate the problem of speeding cars along this road.
No consideration has been given to how residents living in the proposed new houses would access these without damaging significantly the area. More vehicles using Church Road would put additional pressure on the junction with the A140 which is already very dangerous due to poor visibility in both directions. Church road is already used as a rat run onto the A140 for vehicles coming from Mulbarton and any junction with Church road coming from the new development would exaccerbate the problem of speeding cars along this road.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17786
Received: 04/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Rachael Trivett
As per previous comments - The infrastructure of swainsthorpe cannot cope with more houses, the traffic increase would be very detrimental to the small village. The A140 is bad enough now to try and get onto from swainsthorpe so more cars in the village will only add to this problem.
As per previous comments - The infrastructure of swainsthorpe cannot cope with more houses, the traffic increase would be very detrimental to the small village. The A140 is bad enough now to try and get onto from swainsthorpe so more cars in the village will only add to this problem.