GNLP0334R

To many houses not enough thought given to doctors, schools, parking on roads (too many cars at least 3 to one house (think about it)).

The excess traffic coming through Reepham Road will impact my Business. The Reepham Road at current is very Busy during 7-8.30 am and 4.30-6.30pm. For any person to cross the road is very challenging trying to avoid being run over with cars blocking traffic jam. This development will also affect health from pollution.

some of the concerns are as follows:
- Excessive traffic coming on Reepham Road
- No excess to country walk with the family
- Pollution in increase in the area.

GNLP0032R + 0034R - The amount of houses proposed will put a lot of pressure on doctors, schools and local transport.
It will also increase the traffic flow, with enormous building works, traffic, the pollution in the local area will increase dramatically and effect the health of local residents the doctors in the area are already stretched so any more pressure on them will be even worse for local residents, schools are also full in the area so how many extra schools, doctors and dentists surgeries are proposed in the new scheme, if none it is not practical.
GNLP2173 - Should still be kept as recreational site for the use of local residents.

We note the proximity of this site to Drayton Wood CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.

Hellesdon is currently at saturation point with housing. Shortage of green space. Too much traffic already. No additional plans for GP facilities.

The site is in the parish of Horsford but remote from the village centre and is adjacent to the parish of Hellesdon. The cumulative detrimental impact of the submitted developments off Reepham Rd on both Drayton and Hellesdon is unacceptable. The land should be used for open space to help Hellesdon meets its shortfall as dictated by BDC policy.

Drayton Parish Council discuss the consultation at its monthly meeting on 6 December 2018.

The Parish Council fully endorses the view of CPRE and in particular the request not to reward existing landowners with more allocations when previous sites have not yet been built out. The Parish Council has seen a number of windfall sites being granted permission in the parish and these sites should form part of the housing target, not as an addition to it.

There are three new sites which affect the Parish.

GNLP2106

Although predominantly in the parish of Taverham, this site would have a determinantal impact on Drayton too. The additional vehicle movements 70 dwellings would generate on Taverham Rd and potentially on the Fakenham Rd is unacceptable. The slope of the land towards the River Wensum would cause serious surface water flooding issues on Costessey lane and beyond. The proximity to County Wildlife and Special Scientific sites means this location should not be considered for housing development.

GNLP0334R

The site is in the parish of Horsford but remote from the village centre and is adjacent to the parish of Hellesdon. The cumulative detrimental impact of the submitted developments off Reepham Rd on both Drayton and Hellesdon is unacceptable.

GNLP0332R

The site although in the parish of Horsford is on the boundary of the parish of Hellesdon. The Parish Council have concerns about the site being in or adjacent to the airport safety zone. The cumulative detrimental affect of the submitted developments off Reepham Rd on Drayton and Hellesdon is unacceptable.

The road on heath crescent isn't suitable to take more traffic. To enter Cromer Road and Fifers Lane from Heath Crescent is an nightmare. The volume on Cromer Road and Fifer Lane is still immense.
Reepham Road isn't big enough for the volume of traffic it will bring into the village.

It's a problem to get an app. At the doctors so adding more housing is making it worse. The A&E will be overrun with people who get an app. With the G.P.
Green Space we need for relaxation and health helping to relieve depression and stress. Saving app. With the G.P.
Not enough local school to take more children.

After the unfortunate decision to allow Persimmon Homes to build 1,000 of the lowest quality and grade of houses on the Hellesdon Royal Norwich Golf Club without any substantial improvements to the local infrastructure, it is inconceivable that anyone would want to continue to build or develop even more sites around Hellesdon before assessing the impact to the local community and the facilities and the utilities that will come just from the completed White Rose Park site once it becomes populated over the new few years. There are already drainage and flooding issues around Hellesdon even before the current developing 1,000 homes are populated for example.
To go ahead with any more of these newly proposed developments will forever change Hellesdon for the worse and it is obviously far from the best interests of the local residents. As a local resident who is already alarmed and dismayed at the current White Rose Park development and the impact it is already having on our daily lives, let alone how much more severe it will become once the homes are populated, I strongly oppose these newly proposed sites for the decimation and ruining of Hellesdon.