New, Revised and Small Sites
Search representations
Results for Norfolk Wildlife Trust search
New searchSupport
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2069
Representation ID: 18989
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We support the provision of this site for recreation and leisure. This site has significant opportunities to provide important green infrastructure and open space, which we would be happy to comment on further during the further development of the plan.
We support the provision of this site for recreation and leisure. This site has significant opportunities to provide important green infrastructure and open space, which we would be happy to comment on further during the further development of the plan.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2123
Representation ID: 18990
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Heronry & Violet Grove County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Heronry & Violet Grove County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2158
Representation ID: 18991
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Depot Meadow County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Depot Meadow County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2168
Representation ID: 18993
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to irreplaceable ancient woodland which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to irreplaceable ancient woodland which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2004
Representation ID: 18995
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the River Tud and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the River Tud and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2006
Representation ID: 18996
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the Land at Boundary Farm CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the Land at Boundary Farm CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2023
Representation ID: 18997
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the Bergh Apton House CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the Bergh Apton House CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2026
Representation ID: 18998
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the Marriot's Way CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the Marriot's Way CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2027
Representation ID: 18999
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the Marriot's Way CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the Marriot's Way CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2030
Representation ID: 19000
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to the Horsham Meadows CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to the Horsham Meadows CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
