New, Revised and Small Sites
Search representations
Results for Norfolk Wildlife Trust search
New searchComment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2092
Representation ID: 19001
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Paine's Yard Wood, The Owlery & March Covert CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Paine's Yard Wood, The Owlery & March Covert CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2109
Representation ID: 19002
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Hethel Wood CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Hethel Wood CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2104
Representation ID: 19003
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Brewers Green CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Brewers Green CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2138
Representation ID: 19004
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Land South of River Tud County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
We object to the inclusion of this site in the plan, due to the loss to Land South of River Tud County Wildlife Site which would occur. We strongly recommend that this site is removed from any further consideration in the plan.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2140
Representation ID: 19005
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Harold's Grove CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Harold's Grove CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2160
Representation ID: 19006
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Horsford Woods and Horsford Rifle Range County Wildlife Sites and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Horsford Woods and Horsford Rifle Range County Wildlife Sites and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2166
Representation ID: 19007
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Paine's Yard Wood, The Owlery & March Covert CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Paine's Yard Wood, The Owlery & March Covert CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP0334R
Representation ID: 19009
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
We note the proximity of this site to Drayton Wood CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
We note the proximity of this site to Drayton Wood CWS and are concerned at the potential ecological impacts of housing in this location. Should this site be progressed to the next consultation stage, then we would expect it to be accompanied by further details demonstrating how it would be deliverable without resulting in damage to adjoining areas of ecological value, for example through providing sufficient stand-off between development and priority habitats, and where proportional the provision of green infrastructure to ensure that the site has a net benefit for biodiversity.
