Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy
Search representations
Results for Framingham Earl Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy
Question 44. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific key service centres: (Acle, Blofield, Brundall, Hethersett, Hingham, Loddon / Chedgrave, Poringland / Framingham Earl, Reepham, Wroxham)? Please identify particular issu
Representation ID: 20418
Received: 04/03/2020
Respondent: Framingham Earl Parish Council
Framingham Earl Parish Council strongly endorses the recommendation in the GNLP not to develop the Poringland/Framingham Earl Key Service Centre beyond the existing site allocations. The infrastructure has reached saturation point and is at full capacity. In addition Framingham Earl Parish Council recommends building on existing allocations before new allocations are considered.
I am writing to you in my position as Parish Clerk on behalf of Framingham Earl Parish Council. With reference to the GNLP Regulation 18 Draft consultation Framingham Earl Parish Councils response is as follows;
Framingham Earl Parish Council strongly endorses the recommendation in the GNLP not to develop the Poringland/Framingham Earl Key Service Centre beyond the existing site allocations. The infrastructure has reached saturation point and is at full capacity. In addition Framingham Earl Parish Council recommends building on existing allocations before new allocations are considered.
