Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Search representations

Results for Mulbarton Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 23: Do you support, object or have any comments relating to approach to transport?

Representation ID: 22024

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Public transport provision needs to be improved and made affordable, not only between Mulbarton, main towns and key service centres, but to and from smaller settlements.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 27: Do you support, object or have any comments relating to approach to affordable homes?

Representation ID: 22025

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Affordable and social housing should be provided where needed as a stand-alone provision, to meet the needs of local people.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Object

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 34: Do you support, object or have any comments relating to the approach to employment land?

Representation ID: 22026

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

A large amount of greenfield site is reallocated or being developed near Mulbarton and the Parish Council would not want to see this increased.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Object

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 45. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the overall approach for the village clusters? Please identify particular issues

Representation ID: 22027

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

“Village Clusters” appear to be an artificial concept, invented to justify the dispersal of housing into the countryside, which will not benefit Mulbarton due to the large amount of recent development in the village. MPC are concerned that completely different approaches are being taken by SNC and Broadland Council in the same plan.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 46. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific village clusters?

Representation ID: 22028

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC are concerned that all of the “village clusters” in South Norfolk will not be scrutinised to the same degree as those in Broadland due to being in a separate South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Site Allocations document.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 47. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the overall approach for Small Scale Windfall Housing Development? Please identify particular issues.

Representation ID: 22029

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC believes that windfall sites should be restricted to within settlement boundaries and should also count towards the overall housing targets.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 48. Do you support or object or wish to comment any other aspect of the draft plan not covered in other questions? This includes the appendices below. Please identify particular issues.

Representation ID: 22030

Received: 15/03/2020

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Mulbarton and South Norfolk has not benefited from any major infrastructure developments. In the JCS housing concentrated in and close to Norwich was agreed and supported by hugely expensive infrastructure projects, in particular the Broadland Northway( previously known as the NDR), which was primarily constructed to distribute traffic form and to new housing developments on the northern fringes of Norwich and in the North-east Growth Triangle

It would make sense to see the sites allocated for housing in the existing plan (the JCS) developed before any new sites that are likely to be added in to the emerging GNLP are built on

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.