Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Search Representations

Results for John Long Planning search

New search New search

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 45. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the overall approach for the village clusters? Please identify particular issues

Representation ID: 20691

Received: 11/03/2020

Respondent: John Long Planning

Representation:

Otley Properties Ltd supports the approach to village clusters in South Norfolk, and wish their sites at Seething to be considered through the Village Clusters Site Allocations document:
GNLP0405 North/South of Brooke Road, Seething (allocation/settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0406 West of Seething Street, Seething (settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0587 West of Seething Street; Seething (settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0588 West of seething street, Seething (site now has pp) (settlement boundary revision); ;
GNLP1035 South of Wheelers Lane, Seething(allocation or settlement boundary revision);
GNLP2148 West of Mill Lane, Seething (12 dwellings) (allocation).
They also wish a further site at Burgh Apton to be considered.

Full text:

Otley Properties Ltd supports the approach to village clusters in South Norfolk, and wish their sites at Seething to be considered through the Village Clusters Site Allocations document:
GNLP0405 North/South of Brooke Road, Seething (allocation/settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0406 West of Seething Street, Seething (settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0587 West of Seething Street; Seething (settlement boundary revision);
GNLP0588 West of seething street, Seething (site now has pp) (settlement boundary revision); ;
GNLP1035 South of Wheelers Lane, Seething(allocation or settlement boundary revision);
GNLP2148 West of Mill Lane, Seething (12 dwellings) (allocation).
They also wish a further site at Burgh Apton to be considered.

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 45. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the overall approach for the village clusters? Please identify particular issues

Representation ID: 20692

Received: 11/03/2020

Respondent: John Long Planning

Representation:

Hibbett & Key Ltd support the approach to village clusters and wish their site at Alpington ref: GNLP0400 Land at Church Meadow to be considered for allocation in the South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Site Allocations document.

Full text:

Hibbett & Key Ltd support the approach to village clusters and wish their site at Alpington ref: GNLP0400 Land at Church Meadow to be considered for allocation in the South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Site Allocations document.

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 48. Do you support or object or wish to comment any other aspect of the draft plan not covered in other questions? This includes the appendices below. Please identify particular issues.

Representation ID: 20693

Received: 11/03/2020

Respondent: John Long Planning

Representation:

Otley Properties Ltd request that the CIL charging instalment policy is revised to provide more flexibility for small builders and developers. Otley Properties Ltd would be very happy to engage in discussions about the CIL to explain the issues small developers face.

Full text:

Otley Properties Ltd request that the CIL charging instalment policy is revised to provide more flexibility for small builders and developers. Otley Properties Ltd would be very happy to engage in discussions about the CIL to explain the issues small developers face.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.