Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Search representations

Results for Glavenhill Limited search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 46. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific village clusters?

Representation ID: 20889

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Glavenhill Limited

Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Glavenhill Limited support the designation of Tacolneston and Forncett as a village cluster and continue to promote Land west of Norwich Road, Tacolneston as a suitable, available and deliverable site for housing.

Please see enclosed representations letter for further detail and for the area of land currently being promoted.

Full text:

Glavenhill Limited support the designation of Tacolneston and Forncett as a village cluster and continue to promote Land west of Norwich Road, Tacolneston as a suitable, available and deliverable site for housing.

Please see enclosed representations letter for further detail and for the area of land currently being promoted.

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 46. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific village clusters?

Representation ID: 21285

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Glavenhill Limited

Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Glavenhill Limited support the designation of Morley as part of a village cluster and continue to promote Land West of Golf Links Road, Morley St Boltolph as a suitable, available and deliverable site for a small-scale housing scheme.

Please see enclosed representations letter for further detail.

Full text:

Glavenhill Limited support the designation of Morley as part of a village cluster and continue to promote Land West of Golf Links Road, Morley St Boltolph as a suitable, available and deliverable site for a small-scale housing scheme.

Please see enclosed representations letter for further detail.

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 46. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific village clusters?

Representation ID: 22051

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Glavenhill Limited

Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Draft Policy 7.4 confirms that 4,024 homes, or around 9% of the total housing growth for Greater
Norwich Area across the plan period will be located within village clusters. 1,200 of these homes will
be allocated within South Norfolk through their Village Clusters Housing Site Allocations document.
The Policy aims to promote social sustainability by supporting rural life and services through
facilitating small scale residential development in village locations such as Stoke Holy Cross. The
provision of several relatively small allocation sites is suggested to have the additional benefit of
supporting small-scale builders, providing choice for the market and helping to ensure the delivery
of housing in popular village locations. Village clusters within south Norfolk will be based on primary
school catchments, which provide a proxy for social sustainability.
Glavenhill consider Stoke Holy Cross and related part of the parish, including Upper Stoke to be an
appropriate location for small scale residential growth.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission and amended site proposal

Attachments:

Object

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 46. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for specific village clusters?

Representation ID: 23185

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Glavenhill Limited

Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

My client also has concerns regarding the over-reliance in the emerging Greater Norwich Local Plan
on the wider village clustering approach in so far as it applies/may apply to the more remote rural
areas beyond the former Norwich Policy Area (that has traditionally been the focus for growth) as
advocated under Policy 7.4. This is because without evidence to the contrary there could be a clear
disconnect between the main employment and service centres such as Scottow Enterprise Park and
the more rural village clusters identified/not yet identified. In the absence of a clear growth strategy
and information regarding the cluster locations, my client wishes to raise an objection. My client
contends that a significant part of this defined/undefined planned rural cluster growth should be
relocated adjacent to the village of Badersfield and Scottow Enterprise Park.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to the attached documents

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.