Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13079
Received: 17/02/2018
Respondent: Mr James Lawrence
I object to the proposals that Framingham Earl and Poringland is going to double in size and does not have the infrastructure to sustain the proposals under the GNLP. Its taken enough development to date.
F Earl and F Pigot, Pigot Lane is a small lane and cannot sustain more developments and currently be kept as it is. Pigot Lane sustain traffic via from the main Lowestoft Road as a rat run, which is totally inappropriate and the road speeds regulations are currently far too high for this lane.
This is a lovely village, do not spoil this.
I object to the proposals that Framingham Earl and Poringland is going to double in size and does not have the infrastructure to sustain the proposals under the GNLP. Its taken enough development to date.
F Earl and F Pigot, Pigot Lane is a small lane and cannot sustain more developments and currently be kept as it is. Pigot Lane sustain traffic via from the main Lowestoft Road as a rat run, which is totally inappropriate and the road speeds regulations are currently far too high for this lane.
This is a lovely village, do not spoil this.