Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13364

Received: 28/02/2018

Respondent: mr kevin stirling

Agent: mr kevin stirling

Representation Summary:

.this site is outside the settlement boundary. Main road through village would not cope with approx 200+ more vehicles travelling daily.It is a 'c' classed road & would need significant updates & pavements installed from the street all the way to the pub for safety reasons. is unsuitable re visibility & too narrow.
Village amenities would not be able to cope, would have a detrimental impact on the rural wildlife & small rivers that lead to the broads & disrupt the landscape.
have a direct impact on the properties adjacent & de-value such properties.






Full text:

ref larger site GNLP0531 NOT in keeping with the village ethics.this site is outside the settlement boundary & an increase of 50% of properties( 200) current infrastructure would not cope. Main road through village would not cope with approx 200+ more vehicles travelling daily.It is a 'c' classed road & would need significant updates & pavements installed from the street all the way to the pub for safety reasons.Due to the gradient of road to the pub any access from this site proposed is unsuitable re visibility & too narrow.
Village amenities would not be able to cope, the doctors ( no obligation to increa area of New Inn pub is on a flood plain & thus potential issues with new builds & obtaining house insurance.
this site would have a detrimental impact on the rural wildlife & small rivers that lead to the broads & disrupt the landscape.
With such a large development site proposed would have a direct impact on the properties adjacent & de-value such properties.on a personal note would impact on my privacy & my quality of life & infringe on my human rights based on such values as fairness, respect, equality & dignity.
I have lived in the village for over 20 years & accept some very small developments within the development boundary are acceptable to our lovely village but this would not benefit the village in any way.
The whole dynamics of the village would change & the village countryside would be spoilt ruining it permanently.
Policy 15 of the joint core strategy states that this village has land allocated for small scale growth for 10-20 dwellings only between '08 & '26 not 200 dwellings.
There are many other more suitable sites in other larger villages in south Norfolk that could accept such a large dwelling site with little impact.