Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14090
Received: 15/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Alexander Rowell
If you review the recent planning applications and appeals, save for the weighting given to the lack of 5 year land supply the "important gap in the village@ and Grade II War Memorial mean that this site is wholly unsuitable for a planning application for development to be approved. The development boundaries currently set in Ketteringham should be retained in particular to limit back land development and the protection of the village War Memorial
Further to the following recent planning application on this site:
2015/0075
2016/2134
2017/0413
as well as three planning appeals:
APP/L2630/W/15/3130520
APP/L2630/W/17/3170036 (withdrawn)
APP/L2630/W/17/3181672
Both of the appeals that were heard had the two main points leaving both appeals dismissed.
First:
The main issues in these appeals are the effect of the development on the character and appearance of High Street, Ketteringham and the effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties with particular regard to loss of privacy and to noise and disturbance.
Second:
The main issues are the effect of the proposal on the setting of Ketteringham War Memorial, a Grade II Listed Building and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Therefore, the site is wholly unsuitable for development and if there were not a lack of 5 year land supply further policies would support the above appeal decisions.