Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14156

Received: 16/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Brian Grundy

Representation Summary:

Proposed development would change the character, and more than double the residences in the village. Farmland should not be used (other than as last resort), and the ancient woodland within the site would be seriously threatened. Who would manage and protect the woodland and proposed Country Park? Inevitable consequence of the development would be substantial increase in traffic on Caistor Lane, and further pressure on already stretched local services.

Full text:

- Even if no more than the 180 residences proposed were to be built, it would fundamentally change the character of the village from its existing linear form;
- In terms of scale, it would more than double the 120 or so current residences;
- The land is arable farmland and should not be considered for housing use, unless as a very last resort;
- The ancient woodland of Caistor Wood would no doubt get appropriate protection during any later planning process, but whatever theoretical protections are applied, a sensitive site so close to human living would inevitably result in severe disturbance to both flora and fauna;
- There would be a question about who would have the ongoing responsibility to manage and protect the woodland/country park;
- Current access to the proposed site is very restricted, and even if that could be improved, the generated traffic coming onto Caistor Lane would significantly impact a "Byway" which already struggles to cope with existing (and already increasing) traffic volumes;
- The creation of "Country Park" might lead to "tourist" traffic adding further to the pressure on Caistor Lane;
- Local services, particularly schools, GP and Pharmacy services already struggling from significant recent development in neighbouring villages, would be seriously affected.