There seems to be scant regard given to the increasing damaging effects on the surrounding road network which, as a result, requires increased expenditure on maintenance.
In this context I refer particularly to recent developments and the call for sites in Caistor St. Edmund.

Caistor Lane and Markshall Lane form a popular 'rat run' for access to the southern by pass. The lane has not been christened 'wing mirror alley' without good reason. The carriageway edges have little or no support and are continually being eroded giving rise to dangerous potholes particularly for cyclists. The existing highway drainage is poor with areas of standing and running water. It is narrow in places and the forward visibility is poor making it very difficult for pedestrians. I notie today that Markshall Bridge has been damaged again.

The two sites GNLP 0485 and GNLP 0491 have access only on to Caistor Lane and given the density of development being pushed by the Government would, if granted, increase the danger to road users and accelerate the deterioration of the highway.

An important consideration for these sites, is the disposal of surface water, particularly with regard to GNLP0485. The site is situated at the head of a valley leading to the River Tas where the chalk aquifer is much closer to the surface.

This part of Norfolk south of the city particularly the Tas Valley and areas adjacent to it has great scenic beauty and a large development such as GNLP 0845 would be particularly obtrusive. It would do nothing towards enhancing the natural environment. (The vision for greater Norwich, P17). A case in point is the recent Mulberry Park development south of Caistor Lane where little thought seems to have been given to merging into the environment.