Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17110
Received: 17/11/2018
Respondent: Mr ian paton
Building on this site is unacceptable. Although labelled as one site this proposal is two sites divided by a narrow lane. Proposal takes little account of access between the two sites, which would have a detrimental impact on the environment.
Surrounding roads are inadequate; there are no schools, shops, surgery or realistic transport services. It will destroy agricultural land, destroy wildlife habitats, damage natural drainage systems and over populate a small historic village already bereft of resources.
Traffic to/from site would increase danger to nearby level crossing, pollute the village centre and increase congestion exiting Church Road onto the A140.
Building on this site is totally unacceptable. Although labelled and mapped as one site this proposal is two separate sites divided by a small private access lane. The proposal takes little account of access between the two sites, which in itself would have a detrimental impact on the local environment.
Surrounding roads are inadequate; there are no schools, no shops, no surgery and no realistic transport services. It will destroy agricultural land, destroy wildlife habitats, damage natural drainage systems and over populate a small historic village already bereft of resources.
Additional traffic to and from this site would increase danger at the nearby level crossing, pollute the village centre and increase congestion exiting Church Road onto the A140, a junction already dangerous to negotiate.