Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17154

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Raymond Smith

Representation Summary:

This the wrong location it would have an adverse impact on Honingham. Limited amenities in the village any increase in housing of this magnitude would be unsustainable. There is no doctors surgery, school, shop, Post Office, increasing housing in the village would add significantly to the pressure on those facilities in neighbouring areas.

Bus service is irregular and could not be relied upon for people to commute
Additional traffic from the development would be detrimental to the quality of life of the existing residents of Honingham
This is not an appropriate development for Honingham and should be rejected as such

Full text:

I object to this proposal
The location is wrong and if permitted, this development would have an adverse impact on the village
There are limited amenities and an increase in housing of the magnitude proposed, would be unsustainable
There is no school or doctors surgery in Honingham and any additional housing would add significantly to the pressure on those facilities in neighbouring areas
There is no shop or Post Office
The bus service is irregular and could not be relied upon for people to commute to and from work, there are no cycle lanes, therefore cars would be relied upon
The additional traffic movements generated from this development would be a nuisance to existing residents and cause polution
This is not an appropriate development for Honingham and should be rejected as such
Far better for brown field sites to be allocated for development than high grade food producing land such as this