Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17870

Received: 06/12/2018

Respondent: Ms Natasha Cargill

Representation Summary:

Detrimental cost to the environment, drainage and traffic costs and loss of land.

Appalling and unsustainable for a village this size.

Full text:

This is an absolute travesty. In no way can Honingham support this development, it is done out of pure greed and opportunism.

We don't have the infrastructure within Honingham to cope with this development and it would destroy the look and the feel of the village. Build on the outskirts of the village maybe but not in the heart where we have no bus service, no surgery, no school and no shop. It would cause massive flood problems to the village and cause huge run off, with a potential devastating effect on the houses opposite and down the road. Losing agricultural land which can never be regained is a big worry to the future of our farming culture. The traffic, which would almost certainly involve another 110 cars on the road due to the lack of regular bus service, with the bus stop being too far away for most people to contemplate using, would be ridiculous in a village this size with the road widths as they are.one road leading in and out of the village, the tail backs and traffic generated will be horrendous.

I oppose this vehemently and will fight it tooth and nail and with every ounce of strength I have.