Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 18003
Received: 03/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Keith Simpson
The location is wrong and if permitted, this development would have an
adverse impact on the village
There are limited amenities and an increase in housing of the magnitude
proposed, would be unsustainable
There is no school or doctors surgery in Honingham and any additional
housing would add significantly to the pressure on those facilities in
neighbouring areas
There is no shop or Post Office
The bus service is irregular and could not be relied upon for people to
commute to and from work, there are no cycle lanes, therefore cars would be
relied upon
The additional traffic movements generated from this development would be a
nuisance to existing residents and cause polution
This is not an appropriate development for Honingham and should be rejected
as such
Far better for brown field sites to be allocated for development than high
grade food producing land such as this
The location is wrong and if permitted, this development would have an
adverse impact on the village
There are limited amenities and an increase in housing of the magnitude
proposed, would be unsustainable
There is no school or doctors surgery in Honingham and any additional
housing would add significantly to the pressure on those facilities in
neighbouring areas
There is no shop or Post Office
The bus service is irregular and could not be relied upon for people to
commute to and from work, there are no cycle lanes, therefore cars would be
relied upon
The additional traffic movements generated from this development would be a
nuisance to existing residents and cause polution
This is not an appropriate development for Honingham and should be rejected
as such
Far better for brown field sites to be allocated for development than high
grade food producing land such as this