Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18068

Received: 09/12/2018

Respondent: Mrs Lucy Macleod

Representation Summary:

This application does not make strategic sense. It would be more logical to change policy to allow single property development where there is a compelling social and sustainability need than to create ad hoc settlement boundaries.

Full text:

This seems to be a completely pointless application in strategic terms. Changing the planned settlement boundaries for the benefit of one individual surely makes no sense to a wider plan. If individuals are allowed exceptions to strategic development and a precedent is set of placing a settlement boundary around a single site, then settlement boundaries may as well be abolished. The applicant states that he wishes to develop the site for his grandchildren. Presumably he is not the only person in Hevingham who has grandchildren. Surely it would make more sense to consider a policy change which makes it possible to build single properties where there is a compelling argument for the sustainability of the village rather than to create ad hoc settlement areas in the local plan.