Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 18124
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: 1967 Julie Baddour
GNLP2111 appears to be within the CPRE Norfolk's initial Green Belt proposals 21.02.18 (http://www.cprenorfolk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CPRE-Norfolk-Green-Belt-proposals-27-Feb-2018.jpg.pdf) which 1800 local people have signed. They believe that areas of Norfolk are worth preserving. GMLP2111 is not walking distance to any amenities so more cars and increased pollution. No cycle path, not even a footpath to draw a white line on and write the words cycle-path. Country lanes which do not allow for safe access to the site. Ground that Boudicca and the Iceni could have trod on(The Archaeology of Norwich'Growth Point' and Environs ).Woefully inadequate sewerage provision. Loss of arable land and precious wildlife.
GNLP2111 appears to be within the CPRE Norfolk's initial Green Belt proposals 21.02.18 (http://www.cprenorfolk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CPRE-Norfolk-Green-Belt-proposals-27-Feb-2018.jpg.pdf) which 1800 local people have signed. They believe that areas of Norfolk are worth preserving. GMLP2111 is not walking distance to any amenities so more cars and increased pollution. No cycle path, not even a footpath to draw a white line on and write the words cycle-path. Country lanes which do not allow for safe access to the site. Ground that Boudicca and the Iceni could have trod on(The Archaeology of Norwich'Growth Point' and Environs ).Woefully inadequate sewerage provision. Loss of arable land and precious wildlife.