Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18281

Received: 14/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Glen Coghlan

Representation Summary:

Appeal reference APP/k2610/w/18/3205832.application number 20172032.i live on the corner of the field xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,i have now found on this other website a proposal for 42 houses on Dawsons lane,you really are mad if you think blofield corner road,a small single lane leading down to Little Plumstead is going to cope.you already have agreed to Bennet homes building 36 new properties on this road.you then turn down the eight proposed houses on Dawson's lane,as outside the settlement area and now allowed the appeal to this,which is bad enough,as this would be down a single unprecedented lane and building on good farmland,but not good building land,as this field gets saturated in heavy rain,so eight hard standing properties would make this even worse and as for 42 properties would create nothing but huge problems as the site slopes a lot from Dawson's lane down to Laundry lane,this area is already a high risk to surface water flooding as shown on Environmental agency surface water flood risk maps also what plans are there for foul waste,the huge impact of traffic.health and safety to pedestrians who love to walk the area enjoying the beautiful country side,the cycle clubs and horses that go past.the wildlife that we get from the field coming into the garden,would all be gone for good.nothing good would come from this only the builder and land owner making money,who else benefits,I do not have a problem with building new houses,but in a suitable and safe environment.

Full text:

Appeal reference APP/k2610/w/18/3205832.application number 20172032.i live on the corner of the field xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,i have now found on this other website a proposal for 42 houses on Dawsons lane,you really are mad if you think blofield corner road,a small single lane leading down to Little Plumstead is going to cope.you already have agreed to Bennet homes building 36 new properties on this road.you then turn down the eight proposed houses on Dawson's lane,as outside the settlement area and now allowed the appeal to this,which is bad enough,as this would be down a single unprecedented lane and building on good farmland,but not good building land,as this field gets saturated in heavy rain,so eight hard standing properties would make this even worse and as for 42 properties would create nothing but huge problems as the site slopes a lot from Dawson's lane down to Laundry lane,this area is already a high risk to surface water flooding as shown on Environmental agency surface water flood risk maps also what plans are there for foul waste,the huge impact of traffic.health and safety to pedestrians who love to walk the area enjoying the beautiful country side,the cycle clubs and horses that go past.the wildlife that we get from the field coming into the garden,would all be gone for good.nothing good would come from this only the builder and land owner making money,who else benefits,I do not have a problem with building new houses,but in a suitable and safe environment.please come and view site,I would be more than happy to meet a planning officer to discuss