Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 18534
Received: 11/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Paul Rogers
All three sites of GNLP2063, GNLP2061, and GNLP2064 are OUTSIDE the village boundary. They are not in keeping with the village at all! Terrible choices. Very dangerous.
The village is linear! This would make the village unsafe due to these access points!
Not enough utilities space available for all 3 sites.
Rockland is a service village! So a massive jump is not suitable anyway, regardless of location.
Many better sites proposed than these three on the Norwich plan. Where do you draw the line? Building on such rural land is a travesty to nature. Object strongly.
All three sites of GNLP2063, GNLP2061, and GNLP2064 are OUTSIDE the village boundary. They are not in keeping with the village at all! Terrible choices. Very dangerous.
The village is linear! This would make the village unsafe due to these access points!
Not enough utilities space available for all 3 sites.
Rockland is a service village! So a massive jump is not suitable anyway, regardless of location.
Many better sites proposed than these three on the Norwich plan. Where do you draw the line? Building on such rural land is a travesty to nature. Object strongly.