Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 18708
Received: 12/12/2018
Respondent: Ben Cox
Fully reject this proposal. This type of proposal is completely wrong for a village of this size, and linear shape.
The idea of a service linear village to add 200+ houses over 3 rural entrances (2061 / 2063 / 2064) is simply a land grab by a developer. There are so many issues with such a development like this, it's amazing it's got this far.
GNLP2061, along with GNLP2064 and GNLP2063 are such poor area to develop. The impact on many people, wildlife, main roads, cycle routes, drainage to name a few, means these proposals have to be strongly rejected.
Fully reject this proposal. This type of proposal is completely wrong for a village of this size, and linear shape.
The idea of a service linear village to add 200+ houses over 3 rural entrances (2061 / 2063 / 2064) is simply a land grab by a developer. There are so many issues with such a development like this, it's amazing it's got this far.
GNLP2061, along with GNLP2064 and GNLP2063 are such poor area to develop. The impact on many people, wildlife, main roads, cycle routes, drainage to name a few, means these proposals have to be strongly rejected.