This should remain as prime agricultural land for growing crops.
(Surely the UK will need all its decent farm land after Brexit so we do not rely on expensive imports when we can grow our own!)
Such development of this site would change the village character forever. It
would be not only intrusive to existing properties but completely out of character with
the area. This area was covered by a common from Bonds Road to the A140 and Rectory Road to Ram Lane and on the on all sides there are historical cottages adding character to what is a sensitive rural
landscape with beautiful views.
There are no facilities to warrant such a large development.
Drainage, sewers would not cope and there would have to be a large development to
allow for this. It should remain as prime agricultural land for growing crops.
It is part of the Claylands Living Landscape of South Norfolk and should be retained
as such. Development would change rural aspect forever and this site should be
rejected.
Just because Tivetshall St Mary is near to the A140 does not mean it has to have
large developments such as GNLP2041/42 which will increase a lot of traffic onto
what is an overloaded road network.
This should remain as prime farmland for growing crops and this site should be rejected.
Objections summary:
* Historically a Common with cottages surrounding the area.
* Part of the Claylands of South Norfolk
* Development would change the characteristics of the Tivetshalls forever.
* Should remain as prime food growing land.
* Facilites cannot cope with such large development. Such as sewer/roads etc.