Comment
Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy
Representation ID: 20078
Received: 24/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Richard Combes
Having attended the helpful viability workshop on 14 Feb it would be useful to see the supporting evidence behind the assumptions ie conversion rates for ART and AHO sold at 60 and 75% of OMV respectively? BLV at £650K Urban and £200K service village, per acre ?
The ongoing debate around the use of BCIS cost indices verses a QS cost plan needs to be agreed . (could a panel of regional QS firms be used?)
Similarly, scheme GDV needs to reflect actual sale evidence.
Presumably NPS can make their source material available?
Having attended the helpful viability workshop on 14 Feb it would be useful to see the supporting evidence behind the assumptions ie conversion rates for ART and AHO sold at 60 and 75% of OMV respectively? BLV at £650K Urban and £200K service village, per acre ?
The ongoing debate around the use of BCIS cost indices verses a QS cost plan needs to be agreed . (could a panel of regional QS firms be used?)
Similarly, scheme GDV needs to reflect actual sale evidence.
Presumably NPS can make their source material available?