Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20466
Received: 07/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Tony Noon
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. The Discussion of Submitted Sites states “Sites which do not have a safe walking route to school, or where one cannot be created, will not be considered suitable for allocation”. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide a footway to enable safe journeys to school.
The single entrance access is too narrow with no scope to widen. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide a safe access as the carriageway is narrower than required for 2-way traffic.
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. The Discussion of Submitted Sites states “Sites which do not have a safe walking route to school, or where one cannot be created, will not be considered suitable for allocation”. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide a footway to enable safe journeys to school.
The single entrance access is too narrow with no scope to widen. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide a safe access as the carriageway is narrower than required for 2-way traffic.