Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20828
Received: 13/03/2020
Respondent: John Long Planning
It is incorrect to suggest that the site GNLP 2149 cannot be accessed. An achievable access is possible as confirmed by NCC Highways (letter: Jonathan Hanner ref:9/5/18/1043-19/7/18): "...In order to cater for the additional traffic generated...widen the access to ensure a minimum width of 5m for the first 10 metres into the site. This can be simply achieved by relocating the kerb and resurfacing the grass verge (to coincide with the existing length of surfacing)." I can confirm the required minor works are in the public highway/landowners control and deliverable.
It is incorrect to suggest that the site GNLP 2149 cannot be accessed. An achievable access is possible as confirmed by NCC Highways (letter: Jonathan Hanner ref:9/5/18/1043-19/7/18): "...In order to cater for the additional traffic generated...widen the access to ensure a minimum width of 5m for the first 10 metres into the site. This can be simply achieved by relocating the kerb and resurfacing the grass verge (to coincide with the existing length of surfacing)." I can confirm the required minor works are in the public highway/landowners control and deliverable.