Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21787
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Ms claire entwistle
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
This woodland an area of green belt which surrounds the east side of Norwich. It was originally turned down for development by the local council but on appeal pushed through by govt. strategy for growth . it was also seen to be unreasonable, . This beautiful area could be fully developed as a rewilding project, for Norfolk and not given to Luxury housing , non appears to be social housing. what infrastructure would there be for a woodland park. Destroying a natural woodland which is biodiverse is a not in agreement with any future greening plan .
This woodland an area of green belt which surrounds the east side of Norwich. It was originally turned down for development by the local council but on appeal pushed through by govt. strategy for growth . it was also seen to be unreasonable, . This beautiful area could be fully developed as a rewilding project, for Norfolk and not given to Luxury housing , non appears to be social housing. what infrastructure would there be for a woodland park. Destroying a natural woodland which is biodiverse is a not in agreement with any future greening plan .