GNLP0133

I strongly object to developments E and F because there would be a substantial loss of protected green space between the river and Bluebell Road, including the horse and donkey sanctuary. The erosion of green space in the Yare valley is a crime that could never be undone. The whole area is much used for recreation and shrinking it any further seems absurd when it is clearly needed for that recreation, particularly with a rising population. Its current popularity is evidenced by the erosion of some of the footpaths in that area already.

I would like to object to any developement on the sfstrawberry field off blue bell road Norwich , this is part of the hare valley and should be protected as green natural environment. Any developement will cause excessive traffic congestion as well as affecting the wild life in the area

This is a wonderful open space and wildlife sanctuary, it should be preserved!

I oppose the development of the site adjacent to Bluebell Road and the Strawberry field site particularly as they are very close to the river and are within the Yare Valley. The Yare Valley is an area of natural beauty and should be preserved as a natural amenity. Eaton Park, though a valuable resource in the area, is not a quiet, natural space. I oppose any further development of the Yare Valley. In my view there are other less significant areas which are being proposed for development. The Yare Valley is well used as an amenity by walkers, with or without dogs and families. Children in particular enjoy the donkeys and horses. The fauna and flora are special and should be preserved and protected. Regarding infrastructure, the junctions at each end of Bluebell Road are not able to bear any increase in traffic, and the bus service along the road is minimal. I believe that it is important for Norwich to have a "green belt". The Yare Valley provides a natural green belt that should be preserved. If development continues, Hethersett will eventually become a suburb of the city.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

Sport England would support the principle of providing additional sports pitches at UEA, subject to the provision of adequate ancillary facilities and pitches meeting Sport England/NGB technical requirements.

I strongly object to the concept of the development of sites D, E and F. Their development would ruin the 'green corridor' which stretches from the formal Eaton Park through to the informal and locally protected Yare river valley. This is a much valued and very popular local community amenity, also used extensively by people from further afield who enjoy walking, exercising,the wildlife, the tranquillity and the beauty of the valley. The biodiversity and ecological sensitivity of this landscape should be protected- as UEA, a leader in environmental sciences, really should know.

This land is an important part of the local landscape and provides an important environment for wildlife and should be protected. no profits are worth the permanent damage these plans will do and the negative effect ti will have for future generations.

I walk around and enjoy this beautiful area daily and provides a huge mental and physical break from the concrete jungle of the city.

Preservation of the Yare Valley Green Infrastructure corridor is essential.
The large number of proposed development sites outside the valley should meet the expected demand for new housing and other development. The Yare valley must therefore be maintained as a vital green space to meet the needs of the growing population of this area and local wildlife.
In particular, 0133 E and F . Development here would mean serious loss of protected green space between the road and the river, and obstruct the green link between the valley and Eaton Park. This must be rejected.

We conditionally object to Site 0133D, which includes a chalk pit of geological interest listed in the Norfolk Geodiversity Audit as site NCH04. It provides degraded exposures of the Pre-Weybourne Chalk sub-division, a horizon subject to ongoing palaeontological research by Portsmouth University. If development were granted we strongly request that plans be made conditional upon the provision of chalk exposures, as part of Green Infrastructure provision, thus enhancing the site's geological and also wildlife interest. We unconditionally object to Sites 0133E and 0133F, on grounds of negative impact on the landscape character of the Yare Valley.

I really object to this land being used for development. I, and many of my neighbours and friends, really value this green space and use it almost every day. It gets a tremendous amount of use by a broad spectrum of society - you only have to visit it at the weekend to see that, and it is clear from the over-worn nature of the paths that we need more space like this, not less. It is a valuable community resource just as important as housing or academic facilities - being able to access this wild area makes a massive difference to my mental health. It is well known that access to wildlife and feeling connected to nature is extremely beneficial to mental and physical health of society in general. These wild areas on the edges of the city are what makes Norwich and the UEA special and unique, and attracts people to the city and university. Once we build on them they will be gone forever.

This area is extremely good for wildlife, GNLP0133 D-F is adjacent to priority habitat (coastal and floodplain grazing marsh)and is full of many species of birds, wild flowers, butterflies and other pollinators. The area forms part of the Yare Valley Green Infrastructure Corridor and reducing this area could impact all along the corridor, affecting its integrity, and impair its ability to function effectively.

These wild areas on the edges of the city are what makes Norwich special and unique. Once we build on them they will be gone forever.

I understand the need for development, but there are other sites in the city which could be used that would have a much lower impact on people and wildlife.

I wholeheartedly object to the UEA's planning application at sites E and F. These green spaces are frequently occupied by runners and walkers. People visit from all over Norwich to enjoy the calm, relaxing, beautiful environment at these locations. The proposed work will destroy some of the last remaining areas of natural beauty at UEA. Building on this land would further erode one of the primary draws of students to UEA; the beautiful scenery and wildlife which sits in contrast to the stark, concrete campus buildings. These locations are a welcome break from the stress of exams, coursework, money-worries and the other consequences of being a student. Please do not underestimate the benefits of these green spaces to the mental health of stressed students.

Area F is not currently "underused" as is stated in the application. It is occupied by the Little Tinkers Pony Sanctuary, which is home to abused and abandoned Shetland ponies, horses and donkeys. I often visit the sanctuary, which is a busy and popular attraction, attended by many people. Eviction of the pony sanctuary will unfortunately result in many of the elderly animals being euthenised (killed, to be precise), which is frankly not an acceptable trade-off for some new, unattractive buildings. If my plea to reject this application is ignored, I hope that appropriate provisions are made to relocate the sanctuary. I feel passionately about this issue and will invest as much time and money is required to ensure the safety of the animals at this site. Please do not overlook the wellbeing of these animals or the joy that they bring to so many people.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

I am sincerely disappointed to learn of the proposed development sites in The Yare Valley, UEA lake and Bluebell Road areas which I enjoy with my dog on a daily basis. The beautiful areas of Newfound Farm and the surrounding woods are a fantastic wild home to rabbits, squirrels, jays and woodpeckers as well as bats. I have regularly seen kingfishers and muntjac deer in these areas too. It's rare to be able to explore wooded areas so close to the city without having to follow allocated paths, letting our children build dens, spot wildlife and appreciate the peace of nature. Shouldn't woodland such as this be protected? It's ridiculous to strip an area with such established diversity of species in fauna, especially one so cherished and enjoyed by a huge range of local people. Wouldn't it be more sensible to seek out areas with minimum impact on existing beautiful surroundings or redevelop brownfield sites? I see this as a knock on effect from the Rugby Club's successful expansion approval in the area, which I consider to be a shameful decision. I truly hope that the planners and local council see sense instead of profit and prevent our fine city losing it's identity to a hive of urbanisation.

This area is a wonderful link between Eaton park and the green land at UEA. It provides a corridor not only for wildlife but for city residents to get out into open spaces, and strengthens connections between the city and the university, where students and city residents can mix and integrate in a peaceful landscape It would be detrimental to Norwich's aim to be a green and pleasant city; it is important to ensure that Norwich has a green belt, and this is, very sadly, being constantly eroded. There are a large number of development sites outside of this valley which should meet the needs for housing, the Yare valley is very special and should be protected.

This proposed development will further reduce the green space available to UEA students and locals, potentially impacting on student numbers. The locations are a used as a break from the stress of exams, coursework and the other consequences of being a student - removing them could impact on the mental wellbeing of students. Area F currently occupied by the Little Tinkers Pony Sanctuary, which is home to abused and abandoned ponies. Any plans made should account for the relocation of these ponies to other safe havens.

Further, none of the accommodation development UEA has done in recent years has benefited anyone other than the university bank manager. None of the new accommodation is affordable, and its expense has resulted in higher rents in the private sector. I can not see any future development being any different - leave the valley green.

I object to GNLP 0133 E and F. The Yare Valley is already under pressure from the developments at the Bartram Mowers site and the UEA playing fields. It is time to stop any further encroachment on this rare and wonderful green space that is appreciated and enjoyed by so many. New building must happen but we should not deny future generations the opportunity to enjoy this space as we do when alternative sites for development exist.

The proposals would destroy areas of natural beauty which are of immense value to the people of Norwich and to wildlife. Now that UEA has grown, students and staff need MORE open spaces, not fewer. They are important for the physical and psychological health of anyone living on that side of Norwich. The Yare valley is a vital green space and is of great environmental value.

Building on any of these proposed sites would mean considerable loss of green space, and would inevitably increase pollution in the Yare Valley, which is supposed to be a protected area, due to its value to the wildlife and the human population of the valley . Rather than reducing the green space available, efforts should be directed to preserving and enhancing the green corridor to meet the increased demands of the growing population. There seem to be sufficient development sites outside the valley to meet expected growth needs.

I strongly object to any development on the strawberry fields area. This is important Green Belt and wildlife sanctuary, it is delightful. It is important to students as much as locals. Flooding is an issue downstream and development along this watercourse will exacerbate the problem. Further developments should be kept back from this area. The road bridge between Cringleford and Eaton is a bottleneck so all areas needs to be kept free of further development that feed into the river from Colney Lane and Bluebell Road. There is already much new development upstream.

* I want to object to the develop on this site I walk this area regularly to help me maintain my physical and for me more importantly my mental health. I suffered a mental breakdown 10 years ago and walking in green areas was part of my healing process. In good weather I frequently walk to the horse's field along Bluebell Road to watch the sunset. Since my neighbours built their extension I can no longer see it from my property. It is seemingly small things that are very very important to me. The Yare Valley is a vital part of my wellbeing.
* The Yare Valley Green Infrastructure Corridor is more than the sum of its parts. Any reduction in its area could impact all along the corridor, affecting its integrity, and impair its ability to function effectively.
* The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor
* The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from housing developments elsewhere.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made not to decrease it size to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments in cringleford and roundhouse park

Why build on yet more green areas? Use brownfield sites - there are a lot of them!
Please do not destroy an area full of bird and animal life - I have walked here for over 20 years and would miss this green lung of the city.
Also, isn't much of this on flood plain?

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and,as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths.
What Norwich needs is accommodation for low paid workers and single people who cannot find affordable housing.
It does not need yet more 3 and 4 bedroom luxury houses.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans and wildlife. The large number of development sites being proposed outside the River Yare valley should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and is under increasing pressure as the surrounding area becomes more built up, the number of students at UEA and visitors to Earlham Park increases. In the thirty years I have known this area, paths have become wider and more areas have become trampled. We risk losing an important asset to Norwich. Rather than reduce the amount of green space, every effort should be made to increase its extent, to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

The University of East Anglia prides itself on its green campus, providing students a place to enjoy nature and relax from the stresses of university work. Tearing down and developing these green spaces will have serious adverse affects to the mental and physical wellbeing of these students, but also to the reputation of UEA. These areas are habitats for all sorts of animals, and with the university providing world class degrees in ecology and conservation, while being associated with one of the best plant research institutes in the world, destroying these habitats will also destroy the stature of the university. Furthermore, many members of the public who live in the area use these green spaces for walking their dogs, exercising, or just to get out and enjoy nature. This development is an awful idea, as these green spaces are valued much more, by many people, than any buildings will be that replace them.

My objection is primarily to sites 0133 D and F - I am deeply disappointed that local plans don't seek to preserve this precious, increasingly fragile and vulnerable green space and unique river valley environment. In addition to protection of the wildlife and ecology, this area is an extremely well used leisure amenity and it seems like madness to shrink it further, particularly in the context of development sites that lie further west (0307, 0331) and the far greater urban sprawl indicated by developments in Hethersett, Wymondham. This very special green space must be protected.

The proposed loss of green area is unacceptable. This is protected area for a reason. We all breathe the air near here, we learn about nature, we walk and clear our thoughts around here every day. There are so many unquantifiable benefits and I am afraid that it will only be looked at in terms of profit and the quanitifiable. We NEED these areas to be kept intact.

Are we SURE that these developments are what the community wants? There will be no going back. The habitats and the atmosphere of the are will be lost forever.