GNLP0133

The proposed loss of green area is unacceptable. This is protected area for a reason. We all breathe the air near here, we learn about nature, we walk and clear our thoughts around here every day. There are so many unquantifiable benefits and I am afraid that it will only be looked at in terms of profit and the quanitifiable. We NEED these areas to be kept intact.

Are we SURE that these developments are what the community wants? There will be no going back. The habitats and the atmosphere of the are will be lost forever.

I strongly object to the proposed development of GNLP0133 B, D, E and F.
These areas are important green spaces, and are really well-used, in parts the environment is already showing signs of overuse.They are also a vital area for wildlife.
The Yare Valley has already been affected negatively not only by the construction of retirement housing along Bluebell Road but also by the proposed construction of the Rugby Club facilities. Any further encroachment on the green space will have an additional detrimental effect and the benefit of the Yare Valley will be lost.

I'm deeply opposed to any further development of the Yare Valley which is a diverse area for wildlife and a sanctuary for the local community.

GNLP 00133 E/F
The proposal to develop further along this valley by the UEA is counter to the 'protected' corridor of the Yare Valley status and I am amazed that the UEA has even considered this.
It is important not only to protect the environment for the unique habitate that it is, but also for the ihabitants of the surounding areas. With the icreased density of population it is necessary to retain these for both younger and older generations for exercise, peace and tanquility in busy lives. The valley must be preserved so Norwich remains a 'Fine' City

GNLP0133-A - University Drive North

This site is promoted for additional Sportspark related development(e.g. New sports pitches, car parking or other ancillary uses).

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

The site lies to the north of the UEA campus and comprises 1.30 hectares. The site constitutes previously undeveloped land and falls within the defined Settlement Boundary. The site has been assessed in the HELAA:

● Access, Accessibility to Services, Transport and Roads: all Green rated. The site benefits from frontage onto Earlham Road, though it is recognised that the local road network is unsuitable at present, but that this can be addressed through development.
● Utilities Capacity and Infrastructure: both Green rated.
● Flood Risk: Green rated. The site is situated within Flood Zone 1.
● Historic Environment: Green rated. The site is situated beyond the vicinity of the Earlham Conservation Area and the Earlham Hall Listed Buildings.
● Townscapes, Biodiversity and Geodiversity, Significant Landscapes: Amber rated. The HELAA assessment asserts that development may impinge on the setting of this part of the Campus, and will result in the loss of mature trees within a locally protected landscape belt. However, from a review of Norwich City Council's database, the site does not contain any TPOs. Nevertheless, the landscaping of any development here will be carefully considered to incorporate the local woodland into any development. This would be informed by detailed arboricultural assessments to determine the health and significance of trees on site.
● Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses: Green rated. The site adjoins the Sportspark.

From this, it is apparent that the most significant planning constraints for this site relates to Biodiversity and Townscape, relating to the threat to woodland fronting Earlham Road. The design of the site would aim to retain as much of the tree belt as possible, and would be subject to further discussions with the GNLP team.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases or restrictive covenants on the site. Consequently, the site is available for development immediately.

Achievable

The achievability of the site for Sportspark related uses is dependent upon the mitigation works that can be undertaken to reduce impacts upon the tree belt fronting Earlham Road. This will be subject to further discussions with the City Council, to ascertain whether development in this location would be feasible, and whether the enhancement of the Sportspark would outweigh the harm to the tree belt.

The achievability of development, in principle, will be determined by the outcomes of a detailed arboricultural evaluation of the condition/quality of trees on site. Pending the outcomes of such evaluations, any development on site would provide a landscaped setting, using existing trees to frame development.

Viable

Further evidence on viability can be provided on a strictly private and confidential basis, should this be deemed necessary.

Summary

The site would represent a logical extension to the Sportspark to the north of the site. However, it is appreciated that this site has the potential to have an adverse impact upon the existing tree belt. Further arboricultural work would be undertaken at the appropriate time to inform any proposals, to ascertain the full implications the trees/landscape may have on the development. This arboricultural information would accompany any subsequent planning application. Notwithstanding this, these constraints alone would not render the site undevelopable, as the site remains suitable for all the other reasons outlined above.

GNLP0133-B - University Drive West - Undeveloped Part of the Earlham Hall Allocation

This site comprises the existing undeveloped part of the Earlham Hall allocation. Policy R39 of the Norwich Site Allocations and Site Specific Policies Plan allocates Earlham Hall for business use, including a new exemplary low carbon building, which has been provided with the development of the Enterprise Centre on the former CityCare depot site.

The principle for development on site, therefore, has been established with the construction of the Enterprise Centre (Phase 1). This representation endeavours to provide an updated assessment of the site's deliverability, to justify the case for carrying forward the undeveloped portion of the allocation (Phase 2), which currently benefits from an outline consent (ref: 12/02266/F). However, this has not yet been brought forward for UEA related development, and the outline permission is due to lapse. The retention of this site for UEA related development is important for the long-term, sustainable growth of this part of the UEA Campus.

The Earlham Hall Vision and Delivery Document (prepared by Bidwells, 2011) recognises the importance of the spatial, functional and intellectual relationships between the UEA, the rest of the NRP, the local community, Norwich and beyond. The intention to provide a pedestrian/cycle link from the Earlham Hall development to the NRP Triangle Car Park site offers a unique opportunity to create further linkages with the wider NRP.

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

The suitability of the site for UEA related uses was assessed in the HELAA:

● Access, Accessibility to Services, Transport and Roads: Green rated. The site is served by University Drive and enjoys excellent connectivity to the wider Campus. The Earlham Hall Vision and Delivery Document (2011) states that areas for parking/servicing will be discouraged on site, in favour of higher-order uses that are ancillary to the Enterprise Centre or the wider UEA. Further highways evidence would be provided at the planning application stage to substantiate any proposals. Furhtermore, the proposed pedestrian/cycle link will enhance connectivity between the UEA and the wider NRP, in line with the Earlham Hall Vision and Delivery Document.
● Utilities Capacity and Utilities Infrastructure: Green rated.
● Contamination and Ground Stability and Flood Risk: Green rated. The site is within Flood Zone 1.
● Market Attractiveness, Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses: Green rated. The site is well related to the existing Campus.
● Biodiversity and Geodiversity: Green rated.
● Open Spaces: Green rated.
● Significant Landscapes, Townscapes, Historic Environment: Amber rated. Development at this location has the potential to impact upon the setting of the Listed Buildings within Earlham Hall and the Conservation Area to the west. Any development here would enhance the setting of the heritage assets with more appropriate uses.

Furthermore, the site is brownfield, which was previously occupied by a nursery. The retention of the site allocation for business uses will help bring disused land back into productive use.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases or restrictive covenants on the site. Consequently, the site is available for development immediately.

Achievable

As referred to above, the site has been previously allocated for business use, and no changes to the existing allocation are proposed in carrying this allocation forward. Limited weight can, therefore, be afforded to concerns around impacts upon heritage assets when the principle of development has been established, with the UEA maintaining a commitment to preserving heritage assets. Development at the site is considered highly achievable, in line with the Earlham Hall Vision and Delivery Document (2011) and the existing consent.

Viable

The development of Phase 2 of the Earlham Hall allocation (ref: 12/02266/F) for further UEA related uses is considered viable, taking into consideration the various policy requirements in relation to matters such as CIL contributions. Further evidence on viability can be provided on a strictly private and confidential basis, should this be deemed necessary, when the exact use of the site is determined.

Summary

This representation seeks to retain site allocation R39 for business uses, with no changes proposed to the principle of UEA related development on the site. The potential impact on heritage assets is recognised, though the principle of UEA related development has been established on the site. The design of the remaining land will offer a considerable improvement to the current setting of the area. Any planning application for the site would be informed by a Heritage Impact Assessment to determine the significance of heritage impacts.

GNLP0133-C - Cow Drive North

The former Blackdale School was allocated under Policy R40 of Norwich Site Allocations and Site Specific Policies Plan for further student accommodation. Part of the existing allocation has been completed (planning ref: 15/00121/F). Phase 1 of the development, comprising blocks A & B, delivered 514 bedrooms, which opened for Semester 1 of the 2016-2017 academic year.

This site comprises the existing undeveloped part of the Blackdale allocation to be carried forward, currently consented as Phase 2 of the 15/00121/F planning consent, which will deliver further student accommodation within two blocks (C & D). The site consists of the remaining teaching buildings associated with the former Blackdale School, which were repurposed as a site office for the construction of Phase 1 of the site. The retention of the site allocation would secure land for further student accommodation on Campus to 2036.

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

The suitability of the site was assessed in the HELAA. The assessment indicated that there were no planning constraints/impacts that would impede the development of the site, with all variables achieving a Green rating. The site, therefore, remains suitable for its allocated use, and should be carried forward in the next Plan period.

Additionally, the allocation would deliver student accommodation within the Campus. This will reduce the need for student accommodation in the City Centre, and around the wider area.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases or restrictive covenants on the site. Consequently, the site is readily available for development in the short-term.

Achievable

The delivery of student accommodation at the site is considered achievable in the short-term.

Viable

Further evidence on viability for Phase 2 of the existing allocation can be provided on a strictly private and confidential basis, should this be deemed necessary.

Summary

The site benefits from a site allocation for student accommodation. Furthermore, development at the site is not constrained in planning terms, so there is little justification for not carrying the remaining portion of the allocation over into the next Local Plan period to safeguard the potential site for further student accommodation within the Campus.

GNLP0133-D - Land South of Suffolk Walk (Strategic Reserve)

This site, situated on the southern edge of the Campus, south of Suffolk Walk, is allocated for Campus expansion under Policy R41 of the Norwich Site Allocations and Site Specific Policies Plan. Similarly, the UEA Development Framework Strategy (DFS) identified that the site may be needed to meet growth needs up to 2030, potentially for student accommodation, or other UEA related uses.

This representation aims to retain this allocation into the next Local Plan period to 2036, to secure the long-term sustainable growth of the UEA Campus, following the development of the Blackdale School site (R40) and Earlham Hall site (R39). The case for retaining the allocation is explored in further detail below.

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

The suitability of the site for UEA related development has been assessed in the HELAA:

● Access, Accessibility of Services, Transport and Roads: Green rated. The site can be accessed via the existing pedestrian/road network, which is deemed unsuitable in the HELAA. It is anticipated that this can be overcome/mitigated through development, alongside any assessment of highway impacts which supports an application for development on this site in the future.
● Utilities Capacity and Utilities Infrastructure: Green rated.
● Contamination and Ground Stability and Flood Risk: Green rated. No contamination anticipated on site, and the site is within Flood Zone 1.
● Open Space: Green rated.
● Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses: Green rated. The site is well related to the wider Campus.
● Significant Landscapes and Townscapes: Amber rated. Development at the site has the potential to impact upon the UEA Broad and the River Yare Character Area. As the existing allocation demonstrates, the building line is anticipated to follow the curved architecture of surrounding buildings, thereby relating well to the existing buildings and preventing any encroachment on the landscape around The Broad, and significant views from Norfolk Terrace. Development in this location would endeavour to protect the visual setting of the south elevations of 'The Prospect', while maintaining Lasdun's original Campus vision.
● Biodiversity/Geodiversity: Amber rating. The proximity of the site to the UEA Broad County Wildlife Site means that the site may impact upon any wildlife in the area. During construction, measures will be established as part of any planning permission to ensure that the construction does not impact adversely upon local wildlife, and suitable management measures put in place to mitigate these.
● Historic Environment: Amber rating. There is evidence of prehistoric archaeological deposits on site. Any planning application for the site would be informed by thorough archaeological evidences, in accordance with a written scheme of investigation from the Council. Also, the proximity of the site to the Listed Campus Buildings is recognised, and the design of the site will remain sympathetic to the setting of these heritage assets.

This assessment of site constraints demonstrates that site-specific constraints can be addressed through development, and do not form constraints to the developable status of this site. Based on the above, there is no justification for the deallocation of this site in the Local Plan period to 2036.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases or restrictive covenants on the site. Consequently, the site is readily available for development.

Achievable

The existing site allocation appreciates that the majority of the existing R41 Site Allocation is allocated as strategic reserve land for long-term development, allowing flexibility should the site be required earlier. This representation promotes re-allocating this site in the emerging Local Plan, representing the importance this site provides for the long-term growth needs of the UEA. The retention of this site is imperative for the UEA to achieve its sustainable long-term growth objectives through the next plan period.

Furthermore, the planning permission granted for the sports pitches and associated structures (2016/0233) demonstrates that appropriate and proportionate development within the Yare Valley Character Area can be achieved.

Viable

The long-term development of the site is considered viable, taking into consideration the various policy requirements in relation to matters such as CIL contributions. Further evidence on viability can be provided on a strictly private and confidential basis, should this be deemed necessary, at the planning application stage.

Summary

This site should be retained as an allocation for the strategic growth of the UEA Campus. There is no evidence to suggest that new planning constraints outweigh the benefits of retaining the allocation. The re-allocation of this land will ensure that the UEA has a sustainable area to expand in the long-term.

GNLP0133-E - Strawberry Fields

Land at Strawberry Fields would form a southern expansion to the UEA Campus, potentially forming an extension to the existing allocation at Land South of Suffolk Walk (R41). The deliverability of Campus expansion in this area is explored further below.

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

The HELAA assessment for the site has identified a number of key planning constraints that may compromise the suitability of the site for UEA related uses.

● Access, Accessibility to Services: Green rated. Excellent pedestrian/cycle links to the Campus, and potential for new access onto Bluebell Road.
● Utilities Capacity, Utilities Infrastructure and Contamination and Ground Stability: Green rated. The site comprises undeveloped land in close proximity to existing utilities services.
● Flood Risk: Amber rated. The site is situated within Flood Zone 1, though Flood Zones 2 and 3 adjoin the site to the east, comprising the floodplain of the UEA Broad. Any development in this location would be informed by a Flood Risk and Surface Water Drainage Assessment to ascertain the flooding and drainage issues at the site. This will inform the design and construction processes involved in any development.
● Market Attractiveness: Amber rated. The potential impact of the development upon the Townscape of Bluebell Road and the wider campus may impact upon the market attractiveness of the site, as the site may require exemplary design to outweigh landscape impacts. This is a matter to be discussed further with Norwich City Council, at the point of developing proposals for the site, alongside viability considerations.
● Significant Landscapes, Open Space and Townscapes: Amber and red rated. The site falls wholly within the protected open space/Yare River Valley Character Area. Development on this site is, therefore, visually sensitive. However, should the site form an extension to the Land South of Suffolk Walk strategic reserve site, the design of the site is anticipated to follow the curved architecture of the surrounding buildings, aiming to achieve a coherent large-scale development which relates well to the landscape. Discussions around the design of any development in this location, as a standalone development or as part of an extension to the existing R41 allocation, will be held to ascertain precisely how development on site should be designed to mitigate any impacts on landscape character.
● Historic Environment: Amber rated. Similarly, poor design at the site has the potential to impact adversely upon the Listed Campus Buildings. The design of the site will be carefully considered to ensure that development remains sympathetic to the historic character of the Campus.
● Transport and Roads: Amber rated. The site would require servicing links to the main Campus, which could be provided through the development of allocation R41. Alternatively, the site could be serviced from Bluebell Road. The suitability of this would be determined at the planning application stage.
● Biodiversity and Geodiversity: Amber rated. The site lies within close proximity to the UEA Broad County Wildlife Site. Ecological impacts of development in this location will be ascertained, and mitigation measures implemented, as part of any planning application.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases of restrictive covenants on the site. Consequently, the site is readily available for development.

Achievable

It is recognised that the site has some constraints. The allocation of the site for a UEA related development will result in the loss of 1.60 hectares of land allocated as protected 'Open Space', and within a significant landscape. It is felt that the loss of Open Space and any impact on the Yare Valley Character Area could be outweighed, with appropriate mitigation, by the significant benefits of utilising the site to enhance and improve the UEA, which will help the UEA maintain its role as one of the leading Universities in the country.

Viable

Further evidence on viability can be provided on a strictly private and confidential basis, should this be deemed necessary, should the site come forward as part of a strategic Campus expansion.

Summary

This site offers an opportunity to extend the current R41 allocation, or to provide further strategic reserve land to secure land for the long-term expansion of the UEA Campus to 2036.

The site has some planning constraints. However, it is difficult to determine the impact these constraints may hold on development at this stage, and therefore, further technical advice would be required. The potential to extend the current R41 allocation is recognised, and we would welcome discussions with the GNLP team to determine whether this would be feasible in the long-term.

GNLP0133-F - Bluebell Road

The submission of this site seeks to establish UEA expansion to the south of the existing Campus. Development at this site would represent an extension to the Campus, potentially engendering a new access point from Bluebell Road. The deliverability of a southern Campus expansion is assessed below.

Assessment of Deliverability

Suitable

At present, the site is grazing land, with UEA owned allotments. The site totals approximately 5.72 hectares, and falls outside, but immediately adjacent to the Settlement Boundary. The planning constraints around the site have been recognised in the HELAA assessment:

● Access, Accessibility to Services and Transport and Roads: Green rated. The site can be accessed from Bluebell Road, and via pedestrian links within the Campus.
● Utilities Capacity, Utilities Infrastructure, Contamination and Ground Stability: Green rated.
● Flood Risk: Amber rated. The site is situated within areas of Flood Zones 2 and 3. With appropriate mitigation in the design of any development, this should not pose a constraint to the type of use proposed and, therefore, does not render the site as undevelopable.
● Historic Environment: Amber rated. The site has the potential to impact upon the setting of Listed Campus Buildings. Any development proposals for this site would be informed by an appropriate Heritage Impact Assessment.
● Significant Landscapes and Open Space: Amber rated. The site lies wholly within the Yare Valley Character Area and the Yare Valley Green Infrastructure Corridor, as outlined in JCS Policy 1. This site would form strategic reserve land for the long-term expansion of the Campus. Furthermore, the principle of development within the Yare Valley Character Area has been established with other large-scale UEA led planning permissions, though it is recognised that appropriate and proportionate design will be required to mitigate landscape impacts.
● Biodiversity/Geodiversity: Amber rated. The site adjoins the County Wildlife Sites at Violet Grove and The Heronry and the UEA Broad. Any development in this location would be informed by detailed Ecological Assessments, and appropriate ecological management processes to mitigate any harm to wildlife in the area.
● Townscapes/Compatibility with Neighbouring Uses: Red rated. The site is divorced from the main Campus, and would represent a significant change to the Townscape of Bluebell Road and the Yare Valley Character Area. The design of development in this location would be developed in conjunction with the GNLP team in the long-term to mitigate impacts upon the Townscape of the Campus, and to engender an exemplary design.

Available

The site, in its entirety, is owned by the UEA, and there are no leases or restrictive covenants on the site, which would prevent development. Consequently, the site is readily available for development.

Achievable

The allocation of the site would significantly benefit both the UEA, and the wider economy of Norwich, by achieving the provision of a site for a major facility in the future. The exact specification of the use of the site would be determined in the long term, and may incorporate community uses or uses linked closely with the wider NRP.

Viable

More information on the viability of the site would be provided at the planning application stage on a strictly private and confidential basis.

Summary

This site offers an opportunity to secure land for the expansion of the Campus in the long-term. The allocation of this site as a strategic reserve may focus growth to the south of the Campus, thereby relieving development pressures from other sites, while creating a distinctive new district within the Campus.

Site lies in Yare Valley Green Infrastructure Corridor protected by River Valley Policies. More than some of parts. Any reduction in area could impact along the corridor and impair its ability to function effectively.
Corridor vital to wellbeing of humans and wildlife.
Corridor much used (worn paths). Corridor should be increased to meet demands of growing population from adjacent house building.
Large number of sites outside of valley being proposed, these should meet expected growth need.
Substantial loss of "protected" green space.
Site would obstruct existing green linkage between valley corridor and Eaton Park.
Likely visual intrusion/degradation in corridor.

I strongly object to the loss of green space and the harm that this will inflict upon wildlife. What is more, there are thousands of people who regularly enjoy this area and who use it for recreational purposes. Their needs must be fully taken into consideration. These green spaces will only become more important to the people of Norwich as the city expands. There are plenty of sterile fields outside of the city that should be used for developments rather than precious and biodiverse green space enjoyed by the people of Norwich.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans and wildlife. The large number of development sites outside the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. Rather than reduce the size of the present green corridor, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans and
wildlife. The large number of development sites outside the valley being
proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and
employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a
Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. Rather than reduce the size of the
green corridor, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet
the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments

These proposals, especially E and F would severely damage the setting of the Yare Valley, the environmental and landscape value of which has been largely protected and maintained up until now. The Yare Valley at this point represents a greatly valued area for recreation, wildlife appreciation and escape from the increasingly urbanised environment that surrounds it. Development here would completely destroy the character of the limited area that is so precious to so many local people and students.

Allowing additional building on this protected site would have a detrimental effect on Bluebell Road. There is already an enormous volume of traffic, with vehicles regularly queuing back for some distance into Eaton Street and the Fiveways roundabout.

The area between Bluebell Road and the River Yare is very important for both wildlife and the enjoyment of many dog walkers and families who visit the area for recreation.

This area of the Yare Valley has already been compromised by the building of the retirement complex. Myself and many others, do not wish to see it covered by bricks and mortar.

It is very rare to find green space accessible to all within easy reach of the city. The area is well used by walkers, dog walkers, UEA students, bird watchers and others. This proposal, along with others in the vicinity of UEA on either side of the river, will devastate a beautiful public space. In the wider interests of the community it should not be allowed to go ahead.

I should like to protest against the proposal to further develop between Bluebell Road and the River Yare, including the Little Tinkers Horse and Donkey sanctuary.

Every day I enjoy walking in the Yare Valley and this informal recreation is an important part of my life and judging by my own observations this also applies to many other persons.

The valley is the home environment for much wildlife which would be seriously affected by it's loss as a result of these proposals.

Existing Local Plans identify the Yare Valley as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor protected by River Valley policies and I must ask that planners stand by the Local Plans and do not approve any sites for development that intrude onto the protected land of the corridor.

The effects of these development proposals are irreversible and should not be given approval.

Further expansion and development of the UEA will worsen existing traffic problems in the area. Approval of these would maybe be accompanied by promises to invest large sums of public money creating more underused cycle tracks having very little effect on traffic volumes or parking in local roads.

Over a long period of time much expansion of UEA has been allowed with scant consideration being given to the effect on the lives of it's neighbours in surrounding residential areas many of which were in existence before the creation of UEA.

It is now time to rectify these omissions. Enough is enough.

The loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of humans/wildlife. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

I object to the proposed developments on the land parallel to Bluebell Road. This is (and has been for nearly 20 years) occupied by a pony and donkey sanctuary which provides care for elderly and sick animals. Additionally, the area is used by the local community and students as a family-friendly location for engaging with wildlife and nature. The loss of this area would be devastating to the community and university.

I object to the loss of green space and its impact on the wellbeing of people and wildlife. The large number of development sites being proposed outside the valley should easily meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a "Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor". The green corridor is much used, in some places over-used as evidenced by the condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to increase its extent to meet the needs of a growing population from adjacent housing developments.

I object strongly to the development of areas E and F of this plan. This area is a haven for a diverse range of species including otters, kingfishers, cuckoos and humans.

There is increasing research on the physical and mental health benefits of access to green spaces. These areas are extremely well used by those living in the surrounding areas; access to this green space is an important resource for individuals and families.

There is already considerable traffic on Bluebell Road, with long tailbacks at the Fiveways Roundabout and Eaton, additional development of the Strawberry Fields site would exacerbate this.

The loss of green space denying future generations this beautiful place to walk in. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to improve and protect it.

0133 E & F. The loss of green space denying future generations this beautiful place to walk in. The large number of development sites outside of the valley being proposed should more than meet the expected growth needs for housing and employment, without risking damage to what local plans identify as a Strategic Green Infrastructure Corridor. The present green corridor is much used and, in some places, overused, as evidenced by the worn condition of some of its paths. Rather than reduce its size, every effort should be made to improve and protect it

I object in the strongest terms to the proposed development in the Yare Valley Green Infrastructure Corridor, and particularly GNLP0133 B,D,E and F. This haven of wild life, natural habitat and fresh air, with the river linking it to other green spaces, is one of the jewels in the crown of this city. I use it for exercise and recreation nearly every day as do my family and many, many others.
I feel my children and grandchildren will not forgive me if I don't fight now for an asset which is in danger of being lost forever to future generations.

Objection to Strawberry Fields proposed site (land adjacent to Bluebell Road). This area is currently well used by the general public and students/employees of UEA as a green space, as well as being home to the pony sanctuary. Any development here would have a huge impact on the wildlife and people who enjoy this space. The Yare Valley should continue to be protected.

I strongly object to the destruction of green space due to GNLP0133D-F. This is one of the few green spaces left in this area that the wider community, not to mention local wildlife, can enjoy. It is disgusting to evict a horse sanctuary , not to mention the the impact on a lucrative tourist business - the hot air balloons that regularly take off here during spring and summer. Consequently the appeal of UEA and it's wonderful grounds will be severely damaged.
The impact to the well being of local people, University/students and wildlife alike would be seriously damaging.

Alexander barker wishing to object due to loss of large amount of green space in the area for an unessecary development

We have no comment on sites A-C.

We feel that some development of site D would be appropriate, but the site-specific policy should be written to restrict development only to that which will not unduly impact upon the character of the river valley, and the setting of the listed UEA campus. Building scales, particularly towards the lake, should be smaller in scale, and should be landscaped appropriately to reduce the impact on the lake's ecosystem and provide biodiversity.

We object to site E being allocated for accommodation or any other intensive development. We feel that the character of the river valley should be maintained, and therefore this site should not be intensified beyond its current level, which includes significant amounts of greenery and the river valley beyond. We believe that the university could make good use of this land without intensifying the use by only building small individual units, of one, perhaps two stories, with plenty of open space between.

We object to the allocation of site F. This should be retained as a strategic gap between Norwich's built up area and the Yare Valley.

Please avoid any further development along the Bluebell Road as this will have a negative impact on the physical & mental wellbeing of the local residents who currently enjoy this glimpse of the countryside within the city. The Vision for greater Norwich extols a vibrant healthy community & enhanced environment. This is what this area has at present - it seems nonsensical to destroy what is natural & then try and recreate it artificially. Thank you

The area around the UEA has been overbuilt enough. This threatens to take away valuable green space which is popular with locals, workers, students and walkers. It also increases the risk of flooding from the Yare Valley and adds to the increasing traffic problem around Bluebell Road, Earlham Road, and the junctions with the A11 plus fiveways roundabout. It is a much loved area of green space, especially by Bluebell Road where the horse sanctuary is based.

One of the outstanding features the City of Norwich offers is the proximity of green space for the use of residents.

The loss of any such areas is appalling but to reduce the "green corridoor" of the Yare valley and river with the associated woodland is in my view a tragedy, it provides local residents and indeed students with access to observe the wonders of natural habitats and facilitates relaxation away from noise and pollution.

Already the appearence of the area at Bluebell Road has been changed with the building of retirement accommodation.

Being a regular user of the sportspark I am aware of the inadequacy of car parking facilities, but surely covering grassland with tarmac is not the only option. Is it possible to build an underground car park or put an additional level on top of the current car park, not ideal solutions but preferable?

I regularly uses the Yare Valley for recreational purposes and object strongly to the development proposals for such an ecologically sensitive area. Proposing using any of the land between Bluebell Road and Colney Lane for development would significantly alter the impact on Wildlife, Flood plains and Public enjoyment. This area is on the edge of a densely populated side of Norwich, enjoyed year round, as a beautiful beneficial green space with varied habitats. With additional developments on the hospital side of Colney Lane, green space is more vital than ever. (What are the proposals for dealing with increased traffic needs?)

The UEA has expanded enough! It is only through sheer greed that they want to continue to build on the small amount of land left in the Yare Valley in Eaton. When will it end? When there is no land left to develop no doubt. The land is used by schools, local families, visitors to the area and local residents - these areas, within Norwich, are becoming scarcer and scarcer. This is a terrible shame for generations to come, that they will not be able to experience natural open spaces. The effect on local wildlife does not seem to be a consideration for the UEA, just how much money they can make from this, and how far it will push them up the university ladder of 'top universities'.
Also, parking problems will increase in this area, and they are already enough of a problem with student parking.

I object because there are many flowers and plants, because the ponies give the local community a lot of pleasure, being visited by families in a built up area and because these areas promote the physical and mental health of local people who visit them.

The grassy bank at the top of the pony fields is particularly rich in wild flowers, including a bee orchid, also many other species, which attract insects, including butterflies and bees. Which in turn support birds. The woodland strip at the bottom of the ponyfireld is also rich in wildlife, flowers, butterflies and bees. The field adjacent to the pony fields also has numerous species of wild flowers in the summer.