Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Search representations

Results for East Suffolk Council search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 1: Please comment on or highlight any inaccuracies within the introduction

Representation ID: 22032

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 15 refers to a plan period to 2036. This needs amending to 2038, as noted elsewhere in the document.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 5: Is there anything you feel further explanation, clarification or reference?

Representation ID: 22033

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 70 notes that the A146 forms part of the Government’s Major Road Network (MRN) of local non-trunk roads of national importance. East Suffolk is pleased that the importance of the A146 has been recognised as it is a key link between Lowestoft, Beccles and Norwich. The Suffolk County Transport Model (SCTM) – Preferred Option Traffic Forecasting Report (March 2018) notes that the A146 Norwich Road/Loddon Road and the A146 Norwich Road/A143 Yarmouth Road are two junctions that will reach 90-99% capacity by end of the Waveney Local Plan period, 2036. The two junctions are close to Beccles but fall within the South Norfolk Council/Greater Norwich area. Measures to address traffic issues on the A146 near Beccles are likely to be necessary in future reviews of Local Plans. (See page 36 of The Suffolk County Transport Model (SCTM) – Preferred Option Traffic Forecasting Report (March 2018) https://www.eastsuffolk.gov.uk/assets/Planning/Waveney-Local-Plan/Background-Studies/Suffolk-County-Council-Forecast-Highway-Modelling.pdf)

It may be of interest to the Greater Norwich Planning Policy Team to know that the Barnby Bends bypass Major Route Network improvement proposal has progressed to the next stage with funding to prepare an outline business case. Improvements to the section of the A146 near Barnby, commonly known as the Barnby Bends, would benefit the whole A146 route between Lowestoft and Norwich, and the A143 link to Diss and Bury St Edmunds.

Paragraph 73. The Norwich rail service provides direct access to Lowestoft. Please update the text to include Lowestoft in the list of rail destinations accessible from Norwich

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 6: Do you support or object to the vision and objectives for Greater Norwich?

Representation ID: 22034

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 108. The Council supports the overall vision and objectives of the Greater Norwich Local Plan.

Paragraph 111 would benefit from explaining what the term ‘clean growth’ means. The terms ‘clean growth’, ‘clean transport’, ‘clean pubic transport’, ‘clean energy’ and ‘clean water’ are used through the document without explanation. It should not be assumed the audience is already familiar with specific terms and jargon. The terms should be explained in the text or included in the glossary in Appendix 2.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 14: Do you support, object or wish to comment on the approach for housing numbers and delivery?

Representation ID: 22035

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We support the Greater Norwich Local Plan’s preferred option to support growth, including the use of the Government’s standard methodology for assessing housing numbers and delivery, use of a settlement hierarchy, and approach to the economy. We are pleased the strategy for growth can meet the area’s need for housing, including a buffer, and need for employment land.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 19: Do you support, object or have any comments relating to the specific requirements of the policy?

Representation ID: 22036

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

Issue No.2 in Table 8 would benefit from more specific and detailed information to facilitate electric and low-emission vehicles and their ancillary infrastructure needs. Developers should be encouraged to provide electric charging points for dwellings with on-plot parking spaces, and to provide ducting and electricity supply to communal and public parking spaces to enable future installation of charging points. This would complement policies for East Suffolk (contained in the adopted Waveney Local Plan and the emerging Suffolk Coastal Local Plan) on facilities for electric charging points, by enhancing provision in the wider network.

A Housing Design Audit for England by Place Alliance (see http://placealliance.org.uk/research/national-housing-audit/) found that lower building densities on projects away from the urban core scored poorly in design and there were clear benefits to designing at higher densities with the best schemes averaging 56 dwellings per hectare. This research may be of interest regarding the minimum densities specified in point 4 of the policy.

The Royal Town Planning Institute has produced detailed guidance on how developments can be designed to support people with dementia by creating familiar, legible, distinctive, accessible, comfortable and safe environments. The application of dementia friendly design principles is considered to result in a higher quality environment for all users. Considering the aging population in the Greater Norwich area, and the surrounding area, and rise in dementia, it is advisable to incorporate dementia friendly design principle where appropriate, especially in larger housing developments. (See https://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/1312/dementiatownplanning-practiceadvice2017.pdf) Issue No.7 in Table 8 would benefit from specifically referencing dementia friendly design principles. This would complement the policies in the adopted Waveney Local Plan and the emerging Suffolk Coastal Local Plan.

Overall, we support the approach of the sustainable communities policy and requirement for a sustainability statement.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 20: Do you support, object or have any comments relating to approach to the built and historic environment?

Representation ID: 22037

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We support the approach to the built and historic environment as it is in accordance with the NPPF.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 26: Are there any topics which have not been covered that you believe should have been?

Representation ID: 22038

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We support the approach in the Strategic Infrastructure policy.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 33: Are there any topics which have not been covered that you believe should have been?

Representation ID: 22039

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We are pleased that the Greater Norwich area can meet the housing need, including a buffer, as identified using the Government’s standard methodology, and support the approach in the Homes policy.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 37: Are there any topics which have not been covered that you believe should have been?

Representation ID: 22041

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We support the approach in The Economy policy.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 40. Do you support or object or wish to comment on the approach for elsewhere in the urban area including the fringe parishes? Please identify particular issues.

Representation ID: 22043

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Representation Summary:

We support the approach in The Norwich Urban Area policy.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.