Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Search representations
Results for MDPC Town Planning search
New searchObject
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0264
Representation ID: 22118
Received: 13/03/2020
Respondent: MDPC Town Planning
Number of people: 2
Negatives of site GNLP0264 are the industrial use which will remain adjacent to the site,
possibility of contamination from the current industrial use, flood risk, restrictions on acceptable
vehicle access location and requirement for segregation of vehicles between the residential and
industrial use and higher accident record in the local area compared to area of site GNLP0283.
On behalf of Carl Palmer & Wellington
Please find attached a full Statement (and appendices including a Connectivity Assessment –Canhams Consulting Ltd.) in response to the exclusion of the above site (GNLP 0283) as a preferred site, for your consideration ; and covering individual policies as considered necessary with reference to Policies 7.3 & 7.4 in particular.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0283
Representation ID: 22119
Received: 13/03/2020
Respondent: MDPC Town Planning
Number of people: 2
Positives of site GNLP0283 are the wider community benefits the site can offer, higher level of
affordable home provision, better transport links, better and less restrictive access options and
lower accident records in the vicinity of the site. A key advantage site GNLP0283 has over the
majority of the sites listed in Table 5 (See Connectivity Assessment) is that the site has good connectivity for various modes of travel, with good vehicle links to the Northern Broadway, which would not involve vehicle travel through the village to connect to the strategic road network; whereas the other sites involve travel
through the village before connecting with the strategic road network.
The promotion of this site through the application process is well documented and the outcome through negotiation has arrived at a scheme which in overall terms complies with all policy requirements.
Finally, as fully demonstrated above (See Full Consultation Response), Horsford should be identified as a KSC (or at the very least a Service Village as at present) to secure a sensible level of growth reflecting the realistic status of the village and therefore a contributor towards an effective local plan capable of delivering housing and achieving relevant strategic objectives.
On behalf of Carl Palmer & Wellington
Please find attached a full Statement (and appendices including a Connectivity Assessment –Canhams Consulting Ltd.) in response to the exclusion of the above site (GNLP 0283) as a preferred site, for your consideration ; and covering individual policies as considered necessary with reference to Policies 7.3 & 7.4 in particular.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0067
Representation ID: 22199
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: MDPC Town Planning
Seeking allocation of undeveloped part of site for Live/work units and B1 use (10 Acres approx 4 hectares)
Settlement boundary Extension would be welcome
See full submission for further details
Please find attached completed call for sites form re the above.
Also attached is the required OS Plan indicating the site in red (hatched) outline and also the title plan.
For the sake of completeness I aso attach the Phase 1 Layout plan allowed on appeal, construction of which has commenced .
