Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Search representations

Results for Wroxham Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP0041

Representation ID: 20376

Received: 05/03/2020

Respondent: Wroxham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Wroxham Parish Council endorses the findings of the GNLP report. Such a development would be inappropriate for the current road access. Access from the site to the A1151 would cause further delays to an already over saturated route. Any road improvements would have a deleterious effect on the riverside nature of the location as it adjoins the River Bure.

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP2131

Representation ID: 20378

Received: 05/03/2020

Respondent: Wroxham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Wroxham Parish Council wholeheartedly agrees with the GNLP findings that this would be an unreasonable site for development. During the consultations for the Wroxham Neighbourhood Plan in 2018 this site was overwhelmingly rejected by the people of the village. Given the current severe lack of community infrastructure in the village a further 100 homes would merely add to pressures on medical facilities, schools and recreational sites. This site borders on an Article 4 Direction Conservation Zone and its proximity to this and the Broads make it an unreasonable site for development and would risk destroying the character of the village.

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP2135

Representation ID: 20379

Received: 05/03/2020

Respondent: Wroxham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Wroxham Parish Council wholeheartedly agrees with the GNLP findings that this would be an unreasonable site for development. Given the current severe lack of community infrastructure in the village a further 100 homes would merely add to pressures on medical facilities, schools and recreational sites. It would further add pressure on roads including the A1151 which is often gridlocked during the summer months. Additionally this site is close to an Article 4 Direction Conservation Zone and its proximity to this and the Broads make it an unreasonable site for development and would risk destroying the very character of the village.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.