Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Search Representations

Results for Sprowston Town Council search

New search New search

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP0383

Representation ID: 20904

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

• Sprowston Town Council opposes the suggestion that this is a reasonable alternative site for non-residential development and supports its inclusion instead as a PREFERRED non-residential site.
• If the Park and Ride site is not to be the location for a new school it should be allocated for civic use, and not (as proposed in the draft) for housing.
• Council notes the GNLP has identified no preferred non-residential (e.g.: industrial/commercial or other employment) sites in Sprowston, either as discrete sites or as part of residential development.

Full text:

• Sprowston Town Council opposes the suggestion that this is a reasonable alternative site for non-residential development and supports its inclusion instead as a PREFERRED non-residential site.
• If the Park and Ride site is not to be the location for a new school it should be allocated for civic use, and not (as proposed in the draft) for housing.
• Council notes the GNLP has identified no preferred non-residential (e.g.: industrial/commercial or other employment) sites in Sprowston, either as discrete sites or as part of residential development.

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP3024

Representation ID: 20905

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE NON-RESIDENTIAL SITE.

Full text:

Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE NON-RESIDENTIAL SITE.

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP0132

Representation ID: 20907

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENTS. See uploaded document "GNLP0132 Land off Blue Boar Lane and Salhouse Road_Sprowston Town Council"

Full text:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENTS. See uploaded document "GNLP0132 Land off Blue Boar Lane and Salhouse Road_Sprowston Town Council"

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP0042

Representation ID: 20908

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as an UNREASONABLE RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council COMMENTS as follows:
• the site is too remote – it is outside the current settlement boundary
• the site is not well served by public transport or other necessary infrastructure

Full text:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as an UNREASONABLE RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council COMMENTS as follows:
• the site is too remote – it is outside the current settlement boundary
• the site is not well served by public transport or other necessary infrastructure

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

GNLP2178

Representation ID: 20909

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

1. Sprowston Town Council OBJECTS to this site being classified as an UNREASONABLE RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENT:
• Council strongly opposes the suggestion that this is an unreasonable site for residential development and fully supports its inclusion instead as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE.
• For further comment see uploaded document "GNLP2178 Lushers Loke, Sprowston_Sprowston Town Council".

Full text:

1. Sprowston Town Council OBJECTS to this site being classified as an UNREASONABLE RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENT:
• Council strongly opposes the suggestion that this is an unreasonable site for residential development and fully supports its inclusion instead as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE.
• For further comment see uploaded document "GNLP2178 Lushers Loke, Sprowston_Sprowston Town Council".

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

No Sprowston Carried Forward sites

Representation ID: 20911

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation:

Sprowston Town Council wishes to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the "Draft GNLP Sites, Sprowston Site Assessment Booklet - Residential Settlement Hierarchy". Thus Town Council COMMENTS on the contents of the GNLP Sprowston Site Assessment Booklet as follows:
• Sprowston has three wards not two as stated
• there is not a designated district centre
• housing allocations WERE included in the Sprowston Neighbourhood Plan - See Policy 18.

Full text:

Sprowston Town Council wishes to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the "Draft GNLP Sites, Sprowston Site Assessment Booklet - Residential Settlement Hierarchy". Thus Town Council COMMENTS on the contents of the GNLP Sprowston Site Assessment Booklet as follows:
• Sprowston has three wards not two as stated
• there is not a designated district centre
• housing allocations WERE included in the Sprowston Neighbourhood Plan - See Policy 18.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.