Object

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Representation ID: 20003

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Miss Sarah Mann

Representation Summary:

The villages in a large number of cases, particularly South Norfolk, can not soak up this additional housing quantity for the same reasons as many of the service areas can not, my village directly relies on the infrastructure (doctors/schools etc) of the Poringland/Framingham Earl area which can not support the developments already ongoing and planned in that area therefore the villages in the immediate area around Stoke Holy Cross, Brooke, Woodton, Kirstead, Shotesham, Bergh Apton, Alpington, Seething, can not support further housing either.

Full text:

The villages in a large number of cases, particularly South Norfolk, can not soak up this additional housing quantity for the same reasons as many of the service areas can not, my village directly relies on the infrastructure (doctors/schools etc) of the Poringland/Framingham Earl area which can not support the developments already ongoing and planned in that area therefore the villages in the immediate area around Stoke Holy Cross, Brooke, Woodton, Kirstead, Shotesham, Bergh Apton, Alpington, Seething, can not support further housing either.