Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Representation ID: 20760

Received: 12/03/2020

Respondent: Mr Andrew Cawdron

Representation Summary:

Transport for Norwich: Until standards of affordability, reliability and quality to public transport are raised, there will be no substantive "modal shift" As these are privately owned companies (albeit subsidised) there are few opportunities to make them improve, particularly the bus companies.
Para 71 The "Wensum Link" option may have been identified, but does not have funding or planning and should therefore not be assumed in the GNLP.
Para 75 The cycle network. Where are the cycle network maps/boards in the City Centre? Why do you construct contra flow lanes without protection ? e.g Duke Street

Full text:

Transport for Norwich: Until standards of affordability, reliability and quality to public transport are raised, there will be no substantive "modal shift" As these are privately owned companies (albeit subsidised) there are few opportunities to make them improve, particularly the bus companies.
Para 71 The "Wensum Link" option may have been identified, but does not have funding or planning and should therefore not be assumed in the GNLP.
Para 75 The cycle network. Where are the cycle network maps/boards in the City Centre? Why do you construct contra flow lanes without protection ? e.g Duke Street