Object

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Representation ID: 21339

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Lanpro Services

Agent: Stephen Flynn

Representation Summary:

Lanpro consider it both unsustainable and inappropriate to apportion a greater amount of growth to small village locations than to the higher order Key Service Centres which, it can be assumed from their position in the hierarchy, are more sustainable and offer greater service provision.

Full text:

Key Service Centres are identified under draft Policy 1 of the Regulation 18 Stage C Consultation Document as a third-tier settlement, with growth proposed to these areas after the ‘Norwich Urban Area’, and the ‘Main Towns’.

Despite their position in the hierarchy, only 515 new homes are proposed to come forward through new allocations within all nine Key Service Centres. This compares to a minimum of 1,680 homes that are proposed to come forward in the lower (fourth) tier, ‘Village Clusters’.

Whilst Lanpro recognise the benefits to be delivered to the vitality of rural areas through allocating some new sites and thus increasing footfall within small village locations, it is considered both unsustainable and inappropriate to apportion a greater amount of growth to these areas than to the higher order Key Service Centres which it can be assumed from their position in the hierarchy, are more sustainable and offer greater service provision.

With specific reference to draft Policy 7.3 of the Regulation 18, Stage C Consultation Document, Lanpro object to the Council’s decision not to allocate any additional sites for residential development within the Poringland / Framinghams area, which is sustainably located within the old NPA. This decision appears to be neither justified or positively prepared, nor to have been sufficiently tested and is therefore considered ‘unsound’.