GNLP0447

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12912

Received: 06/02/2018

Respondent: Mr Julian Halls

Representation Summary:

the proposed site has a river running through the middle of it and is subject massive water volume changes. There is high risk of flooding and the villgae has no infrastructure to support this level of development

Full text:

the proposed site has a river running through the middle of it and is subject massive water volume changes. There is high risk of flooding and the villgae has no infrastructure to support this level of development

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14050

Received: 15/03/2018

Respondent: Ms Karen Dunn Hughes

Representation Summary:

Lack of infrastructure. This site has a river through it and is subject to a high flood risk on the Environment Agency's website.

Full text:

Lack of infrastructure. This site has a river through it and is subject to a high flood risk on the Environment Agency's website.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15033

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Steven Dye

Representation Summary:

The site runs directly adjacent to my whole boundary. Development on this site would have a significant negative impact on my privacy and well-being. The site also is a floodplain for the river which runs adjacent to it and flood risks would be probable. In addition the infrastructure in Spooner Row is not sufficient to cope with a development of this scale. The village identity as a linear settlement would also be affected by this development. I strongly object to the proposal and suitability of this site which would erode my standard of living and that of other villagers.

Full text:

The site runs directly adjacent to my whole boundary. Development on this site would have a significant negative impact on my privacy and well-being. The site also is a floodplain for the river which runs adjacent to it and flood risks would be probable. In addition the infrastructure in Spooner Row is not sufficient to cope with a development of this scale. The village identity as a linear settlement would also be affected by this development. I strongly object to the proposal and suitability of this site which would erode my standard of living and that of other villagers.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15305

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Janis Raynsford

Representation Summary:

Flooding issue. Proposed housing too great, coupled with the proposed housing opposite in Station Road which is a very busy road, HGVs etc.

Full text:

Flooding issue. Proposed housing too great, coupled with the proposed housing opposite in Station Road which is a very busy road, HGVs etc.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15412

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Josie Dye

Representation Summary:

Significant impact on our house. Spooner Row not fit for large scale development.

Full text:

I strongly object to this proposal. The proposed site sits along the entirety of our side boundary. It will seriously impact on our way of life, well being and country views from all windows. No doubt significantly reducing the value of our property as a result.

Spooner Row is not suitable for large scale development without significant investment in infrastructure. The train stops once a day arriving in Norwich at 8:30 and leaving at 4:30. No use to anyone who works normal office hours. The bus stop(?!)) is a walk along a 60 mile an hour road with no pavements and across two roundabouts connecting the a11 which cars speed round. The road between Wymondham and spooner row is already dangerous as its not wide enough for two cars in parts and already increasingly busy. The school is also tiny and old.

Support

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 16487

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Trustees of JM Greetham No.2 Settlement

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

These representations are made on behalf of JM Greetham No 2 Settlement in respect of lands known as Sites 1-5, GNLP0444, GNLP0445, GNLP0446, GNLP0447, GNLP0448, Spooner Row, Wymondham. The five sites collectively extend to an overall aggregate site area of 19.63ha. They will
parkland and children's play areas, additional school land, allotments, public car parking, new footpath links and a retail unit to serve local village need; set within a robust landscape, sympathetic to the existing village and the local landscape character. Plus a highly attractive and well-designed modern living environment which respects the local vernacular design. See attached info.

Full text:

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 These representations are made on behalf of JM Greetham No 2 Settlement in respect of lands known as Sites 1-5, GNLP0444, GNLP0445, GNLP0446
GNLP0447, GNLP0448, Spooner Row, Wymondham.
1.2 The five sites within Spooner Row (the 'Sites') collectively extend to an overall aggregate site area of 19.63ha and they have been previously submitted as potential residential development sites under the Call for Sites request in 2016.
1.3 The five Sites will:
* provide a coherent consolidation and sensitive extension to the otherwise fragmented settlement morphology of Spooner Row. This will include the provision of a structured network of public open spaces comprising parkland and children's play areas. It will also include the introduction of additional community infrastructure in the form of additional school land, allotments, additional public car parking, new footpath links and a retail unit to serve local village need;
* fully assimilate into and enhance the settlement form and function of Spooner Row, set within a robust landscape framework, sympathetic to the existing village and the local landscape character. The development of the Sites will not negatively impact upon the character and function of the village;
* comprise a highly attractive and well-designed modern living environment which respects the local vernacular, with convenient and safe access by foot to nearby community facilities such as the local primary school, village hall, proposed parkland, proposed children's play facilities and the proposed shop, as well as the church and local pub;
* improve safe and convenient access to the railway station, bus stops, the local primary school and local community facilities to the benefit of the wider village;
* enhance the ecological and biodiversity value of the village with structural landscaping and the formation of new habitats including ponds, woodland and wild meadow.2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 These representations have been prepared by Barton Willmore on behalf of the Trustees of JM Greetham No 2 Settlement in respect of the Greater Norwich Local Plan to 2036 and in accordance with Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. The consultation comprises the following:
* Site Proposals consultation document (SPCD);
* Growth Options consultation document (GOCD);
* Interim Sustainability Appraisal; and
* The Evidence Base, including the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA), Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) and New Settlements Topic Paper.
2.2 The representations are submitted pursuant to the promotion of lands known as Parcels 1 - 5 within Spooner Row (the "Sites"). The five Sites were submitted to the Call for Sites in 2016 and are the subject of the current Regulation 18 public consultation

Attachments: