Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Search representations

Results for Saving Swainsthorpe Campaign search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Norwich Local Plan – Part 1 The Strategy

Question 48. Do you support or object or wish to comment any other aspect of the draft plan not covered in other questions? This includes the appendices below. Please identify particular issues.

Representation ID: 21231

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Saving Swainsthorpe Campaign

Representation Summary:

Our campaign does not see why the GNLP draft plan contains such significant increases in targets compared with the JCS (adopted in 2014). The Broadland Northway was supported and funded on the assumption that it would enable significant expansion of housing along the fringes of Norwich and within the designated growth area. These proposals implies massive expansion in housing in Broadland and South Norfolk, this appears at odds with the JCS position and would in effect open up vast tracts of green land for housing. We noted earlier in our responses there is no mention phasing of development.

Full text:

Our campaign does not see why the GNLP draft plan contains such significant increases in targets compared with the JCS (adopted in 2014). The Broadland Northway was supported and funded on the assumption that it would enable significant expansion of housing along the fringes of Norwich and within the designated growth area. These proposals implies massive expansion in housing in Broadland and South Norfolk, this appears at odds with the JCS position and would in effect open up vast tracts of green land for housing. We noted earlier in our responses there is no mention phasing of development.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.