Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchSupport
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R7
Representation ID: 22581
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within this site, the grade II listed Church of St Mark lies to the south of the site. Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon the setting of the church.
We welcome reference in bullet point 2 of the policy to the church and the locally listed residential terraces.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R10
Representation ID: 22582
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, we welcome bullet point 6 that references the heritage significance of the site.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R13
Representation ID: 22583
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, the site lies immediately adjacent to the Thorpe Hamlet Conservation Area and close to the scheduled remains of St Leonards Priory. The site lies on rising ground, opposite Cathedral Close across the river. There are also two nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House. The City Centre Conservation Area lies nearby.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings. We accept the principle of development but massing and height will be important considerations. We would expect development to blend in with the existing pattern of development. This should be included in the policy.
We welcome the inclusion of bullet point 2 in the policy but suggest that reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House.
Suggested Change:
Reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House.
Reference should be made in the policy to massing and height. Development should blend in with the existing pattern of development.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R14/R15
Representation ID: 22584
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, the site lies immediately adjacent to the Thorpe Hamlet Conservation Area. The scheduled Blockhouse known as the Cow Tower lies to the west of the site, as does the City Centre Conservation Area.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings. We accept the principle of development but massing and height will be important considerations. We would expect development to blend in with the existing pattern of development. This should be included in the policy.
We welcome the inclusion of bullet point 2 in the policy but suggest that reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby Cow Tower a scheduled monument.
Suggested Change:
Reference should be made in the policy to massing and height. Development should blend in with the existing pattern of development.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R17
Representation ID: 22585
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the reference to the locally listed shoe factory building in the policy.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R20
Representation ID: 22586
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, this site lies close to the edge of the City Centre Conservation Area. Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon this heritage asset and its setting.
We therefore welcome bullet point 2 of the policy that references the Conservation Area and locally listed terraces.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R31
Representation ID: 22587
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, St Bartholomew’s Church which is as scheduled monument and listed at grade II lies to the east of the site.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
There is currently no mention of the church in the policy or supporting text.
We welcome bullet point 2 and also the reference to the industrial garden.
Suggested Change:
Reference should be made in the policy and supporting text to the nearby St Bartholomew’s Church (grade II listed and a scheduled monument)
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R33
Representation ID: 22588
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets on this site, the site lies adjacent to the Norwich City (Earlham Road) Cemetery which is a grade II Registered Park and Garden.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
We therefore welcome the reference in bullet point 1 to the Earlham Cemetery.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R36
Representation ID: 22589
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary the Mile Cross Conservation Area lies to the north of the site.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon this heritage asset and its setting.
We therefore welcome bullet point 1 of the policy that references the Conservation Area
For full representation, please refer to attached documents
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
R37
Representation ID: 22590
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary the site lies adjacent to the Norwich City (Earlham Road) Cemetery which is a grade II Registered Park and Garden as well as the Jewish Mortuary Chapel listed at Grade II.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
We welcome the reference to Earlham Cemetery in bullet point 2. It would be helpful if the policy also reference the fact that the cemetery was a grade II Registered Park and Garden and also referred to the nearby Jewish Mortuary Chapel.
Suggested Change:
It would be helpful if the policy also reference the fact that the cemetery was a grade II Registered Park and Garden and also referred to the nearby Jewish Mortuary Chapel.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents