Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Search representations

Results for Historic England search

New search New search

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R7

Representation ID: 22581

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within this site, the grade II listed Church of St Mark lies to the south of the site. Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon the setting of the church.
We welcome reference in bullet point 2 of the policy to the church and the locally listed residential terraces.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R10

Representation ID: 22582

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, we welcome bullet point 6 that references the heritage significance of the site.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R13

Representation ID: 22583

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, the site lies immediately adjacent to the Thorpe Hamlet Conservation Area and close to the scheduled remains of St Leonards Priory. The site lies on rising ground, opposite Cathedral Close across the river. There are also two nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House. The City Centre Conservation Area lies nearby.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings. We accept the principle of development but massing and height will be important considerations. We would expect development to blend in with the existing pattern of development. This should be included in the policy.
We welcome the inclusion of bullet point 2 in the policy but suggest that reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House.

Suggested Change:
Reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby grade II listed buildings, Bridge House PH and Chalk Hill House.
Reference should be made in the policy to massing and height. Development should blend in with the existing pattern of development.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R14/R15

Representation ID: 22584

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, the site lies immediately adjacent to the Thorpe Hamlet Conservation Area. The scheduled Blockhouse known as the Cow Tower lies to the west of the site, as does the City Centre Conservation Area.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings. We accept the principle of development but massing and height will be important considerations. We would expect development to blend in with the existing pattern of development. This should be included in the policy.
We welcome the inclusion of bullet point 2 in the policy but suggest that reference should also be made to the City Centre Conservation Area and the nearby Cow Tower a scheduled monument.

Suggested Change:
Reference should be made in the policy to massing and height. Development should blend in with the existing pattern of development.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R17

Representation ID: 22585

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We welcome the reference to the locally listed shoe factory building in the policy.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R20

Representation ID: 22586

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, this site lies close to the edge of the City Centre Conservation Area. Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon this heritage asset and its setting.
We therefore welcome bullet point 2 of the policy that references the Conservation Area and locally listed terraces.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R31

Representation ID: 22587

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, St Bartholomew’s Church which is as scheduled monument and listed at grade II lies to the east of the site.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
There is currently no mention of the church in the policy or supporting text.
We welcome bullet point 2 and also the reference to the industrial garden.

Suggested Change:
Reference should be made in the policy and supporting text to the nearby St Bartholomew’s Church (grade II listed and a scheduled monument)

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R33

Representation ID: 22588

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets on this site, the site lies adjacent to the Norwich City (Earlham Road) Cemetery which is a grade II Registered Park and Garden.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
We therefore welcome the reference in bullet point 1 to the Earlham Cemetery.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R36

Representation ID: 22589

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary the Mile Cross Conservation Area lies to the north of the site.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon this heritage asset and its setting.
We therefore welcome bullet point 1 of the policy that references the Conservation Area

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

R37

Representation ID: 22590

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary the site lies adjacent to the Norwich City (Earlham Road) Cemetery which is a grade II Registered Park and Garden as well as the Jewish Mortuary Chapel listed at Grade II.
Any development of the site therefore has the potential to impact upon these heritage assets and their settings.
We welcome the reference to Earlham Cemetery in bullet point 2. It would be helpful if the policy also reference the fact that the cemetery was a grade II Registered Park and Garden and also referred to the nearby Jewish Mortuary Chapel.

Suggested Change:
It would be helpful if the policy also reference the fact that the cemetery was a grade II Registered Park and Garden and also referred to the nearby Jewish Mortuary Chapel.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.