GNLP0402
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20540
Received: 09/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Glazier
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
1. Prime agricultural land needed for essential food security would be lost.
2. This cultivated land also provides a vital buffer area around the SILFIELD NATURE RESERVE allowing green corridors for movement of many species including the Great Crested Newt, a highly endangered species protected by law. This reserve, managed by Norfolk county Council countryside Team on behalf of the Highways Agency, is an excellent example of supporting nature in its wild state but also needs to retain plenty of open space around it.
Therefore building housing right up to this reserve would greatly impact the survival of these creatures.
1. Prime agricultural land needed for essential food security would be lost.
2. This cultivated land also provides a vital buffer area around the SILFIELD NATURE RESERVE allowing green corridors for movement of many species including the Great Crested Newt, a highly endangered species protected by law. This reserve, managed by Norfolk county Council countryside Team on behalf of the Highways Agency, is an excellent example of supporting nature in its wild state but also needs to retain plenty of open space around it.
Therefore building housing right up to this reserve would greatly impact the survival of these creatures.
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 23123
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Orbit Homes
Agent: David Lock Associates
Due to the formatting of the representation it is not possible to replicate it in this format, so please refer to the attached document "Sites Document of the GNLP Regulation 18(c) - January 2020) Orbit Homes and Bowbridge Strategic Land representations, prepared by David Lock Associates)
In the absence of this re-assessment of the new settlement proposals consistently with one another as well as the other ‘reasonable alternatives’, we have serious reservations as to the soundness of the GNLP Sites Document and its likely success at Examination.
For full representation, please refer to the attached documents.